is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Moderators: TheBigSleep, stype_ones, Philaflava
-
- Posts: 14678
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:08 am
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Six-Two really got the shaft huh? It's too bad too, cuz he was dope.
PEACE
PEACE
-
- slime green
- Posts: 5190
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:20 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
fuck you too bitch call the cops
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:46 pm
- Location: Montreal, Canada.
- Contact:
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Yeah for real, who the fuck was that guy? he killed every verse he had.peanut butter wrote:Six-Two really got the shaft huh? It's too bad too, cuz he was dope.
Last edited by thatkidnero on Thu Oct 03, 2013 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Lisa Bonet With Talent
- Posts: 10860
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 3:02 pm
- Location: somethin like my bank account
- Contact:
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
old rap lady says
no songs on chronic 2 were as major as g thang.
also chronic 1 lead to doggystyle. i mean.
chronic 2 has lots of awesome songs but was not a game changer of the chronic 1 caliber.
fin
no songs on chronic 2 were as major as g thang.
also chronic 1 lead to doggystyle. i mean.
chronic 2 has lots of awesome songs but was not a game changer of the chronic 1 caliber.
fin
-
- Posts: 14678
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:08 am
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
thatkidnero wrote:peanut butter wrote:Six-Two really got the shaft huh? It's too bad too, cuz he was dope.
/quote]
Yeah for real, who the fuck was that guy? he killed every verse he had.
I have this on an old hard drive, and it has some joints. If its impossible to find and no one else has it, I can probably upload it
Noz did a lil history on him once upon a time too
http://www.cocaineblunts.com/blunts/?p=1080
PEACE
-
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:35 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Hey now, 2001 has actual quality rapping on it.Tweak Da Leak wrote:just as much as Game "The Documentary" is.
For a chunk of summer 1999 after the Death Rom compilation dropped, it was also set to be called Chronic 2000: No Seeds, but I'm speculating Dre and company didn't want to give their former employer any shine at all, leaving the only connection to "Chronic" as the leaf on the cover right before the 2001.Matthew wrote:from wikiIt was initially titled The Chronic 2000 to imply being a sequel to his debut solo effort The Chronic but was re-titled 2001 after Death Row Records released an unrelated compilation album with the title Chronic 2000: Still Smokin in May 1999. Other tentative titles included The Chronic 2001 and Dr. Dre.
It's probably the best mixed and mastered rap album that's ever been released, or at the very least it's the standard that changed the genre in that regard.
Check out my FREE album featuring MAC LETHAL, ALASKA from HANGAR 18, HOMEBOY SANDMAN and J57 of the BROWN BAG ALL STARS -
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
-
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:43 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Matthew wrote:you're trying too hard if you don't consider this a classic
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Thought I could rely on you to back me up.Let Jaz Down wrote:They're both classics and equally great in their own rights. Arguing between the 2 is some annoying internet faggotry.
You still think Life After Death shits on Ready To Die at least, right?
"Catch me in the corner not speaking"
-
- Posts: 9789
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 7:18 am
- Location: I was wearing Sergio Tacchini before the internet existed
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Paparazzi was pretty major, no? That got loads of radio play over here.sleazy_j wrote:Xzibit hadn't even had any major radio singles before being on 2001. (Too bad because "What You See Is What You Get" had a dope video.) His 2001 and his Marshall Mathers LP guest spots actually did wonders for his career.I guess when it dropped in '99 I was elbow deep in anything I thought was 'underground' so turned my nose up at guest spots by people like Xzibit and Snoop.
I'll download it.
-
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:35 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
It wasn't huge. Like, it got regular rotation in rap circles, but that and "What U See" got no shine from the likes of MTV whatsoever.Y@k Bollocks wrote:Paparazzi was pretty major, no? That got loads of radio play over here.sleazy_j wrote:Xzibit hadn't even had any major radio singles before being on 2001. (Too bad because "What You See Is What You Get" had a dope video.) His 2001 and his Marshall Mathers LP guest spots actually did wonders for his career.I guess when it dropped in '99 I was elbow deep in anything I thought was 'underground' so turned my nose up at guest spots by people like Xzibit and Snoop.
I'll download it.
His guest verse on Snoop's "Bitch Please" was probably his breakout moment in terms of crossing over with John Edward to that next level:
Check out my FREE album featuring MAC LETHAL, ALASKA from HANGAR 18, HOMEBOY SANDMAN and J57 of the BROWN BAG ALL STARS -
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
i know that snoop song happened first but dont forget xzibits album Restless, executive produced by dr dre, thats also what really did it for X to the Z
- Philaflava
- King of The DPB'rs
- Posts: 81367
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
- Contact:
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Def Bitch Please was his defining moment in white pop culture.
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
battlecatmeowstab212 wrote:Hey now, 2001 has actual quality rapping on it.Tweak Da Leak wrote:just as much as Game "The Documentary" is.
For a chunk of summer 1999 after the Death Rom compilation dropped, it was also set to be called Chronic 2000: No Seeds, but I'm speculating Dre and company didn't want to give their former employer any shine at all, leaving the only connection to "Chronic" as the leaf on the cover right before the 2001.Matthew wrote:from wikiIt was initially titled The Chronic 2000 to imply being a sequel to his debut solo effort The Chronic but was re-titled 2001 after Death Row Records released an unrelated compilation album with the title Chronic 2000: Still Smokin in May 1999. Other tentative titles included The Chronic 2001 and Dr. Dre.
It's probably the best mixed and mastered rap album that's ever been released, or at the very least it's the standard that changed the genre in that regard.
I always assumed the real title was still Chronic 2001, that's what the leaf was for.... calling it "2001" seems awfully literal, like trying to pronounce 'efil4zaggin'
-
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:35 pm
- Location: NJ
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
On point.Balzac wrote:A lot of people i know in their mid 20's definitely think its a classic.
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
i echo the sentiments in this thread. i really dug a couple of tracks on it, but ultimately the filler proved to be too much of a turn off. that's why i can't consider it a 'classic' in the traditional sense.
http://cognitiv3dissident.wordpress.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
There might be some filler but it doesnt detract from the overall quality too much as the sound is consistent throughout.
Its not one of these albums with a random Swizz Beatz joint halfway through or whatever. Dre did a good job with the sequencing.
If Eminem was on it more it might sounded a bit unbalanced but Dre seemed to let him keep some of his best stuff for his own album.
Its not one of these albums with a random Swizz Beatz joint halfway through or whatever. Dre did a good job with the sequencing.
If Eminem was on it more it might sounded a bit unbalanced but Dre seemed to let him keep some of his best stuff for his own album.
ONLY BUILT FOR zSHARE LINKS
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:38 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
mud wrote:Thought I could rely on you to back me up.Let Jaz Down wrote:They're both classics and equally great in their own rights. Arguing between the 2 is some annoying internet faggotry.
You still think Life After Death shits on Ready To Die at least, right?
I didnt know I had peoples out there!
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Larry2times wrote:mud wrote:
You still think Life After Death shits on Ready To Die at least, right?
I didnt know I had peoples out there!
Let Jaz Down wrote:They're both classics and equally great in their own rights. Arguing between the 2 is some annoying internet faggotry.
ONLY BUILT FOR zSHARE LINKS
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:27 pm
- Location: Austin,TX
- Contact:
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Bag Lady by Erykah Badu.blastmaster wrote:Xxplosive is the best beat Dre ever made.
"You gonna let a cheeseburger do that?" Yeah, I like to instigate
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Oh shit, I forgot about Six-Two as well. Whatever happened to that guy?
"tim dog! i hope he's scamming bitches in heaven.." - EichTurner
- Philaflava
- King of The DPB'rs
- Posts: 81367
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
- Contact:
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Most of the rappers on that album aren't doing shit these days, besides Em and maybe you could say Xzibit, although none are checking for him. Look at the list.
Tray Dee
Xzibit
Six Two
Hittman
Kurupt
Nate Dogg
Eddie Griffin
Mel-Man
Ms. Roq
Snoop Dogg
Knoc-Turn'al
Defari
King T
Time Bomb
Kokane
MC Ren
Tray Dee
Xzibit
Six Two
Hittman
Kurupt
Nate Dogg
Eddie Griffin
Mel-Man
Ms. Roq
Snoop Dogg
Knoc-Turn'al
Defari
King T
Time Bomb
Kokane
MC Ren
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Well, I mean....Philaflava wrote:Most of the rappers on that album aren't doing shit these days. Look at the list.
Nate Dogg
F.U. MOOLAH
-
- Awesome Vatican Assassin
- Posts: 55482
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
- Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
Tray Dee got locked didn't he?
Kokane still does a lot of shit. Might be biased for me because way too often I'm checking out dubcnn.com tho. First vid got a million views so he did something right.
Pimpin' Juice is just :lol:s. Thought these joints were better was from his album in 2010.
Kokane still does a lot of shit. Might be biased for me because way too often I'm checking out dubcnn.com tho. First vid got a million views so he did something right.
Pimpin' Juice is just :lol:s. Thought these joints were better was from his album in 2010.
"tim dog! i hope he's scamming bitches in heaven.." - EichTurner
-
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:38 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
stung to bitsstep one wrote:Larry2times wrote:mud wrote:
You still think Life After Death shits on Ready To Die at least, right?
I didnt know I had peoples out there!Let Jaz Down wrote:They're both classics and equally great in their own rights. Arguing between the 2 is some annoying internet faggotry.
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
this. being in the south in a non-metro area, this was never on any radio station within my antenna's reach. i only knew of the latter track because I had purchased DirecTV back then, when it was DirecTV/USSB and saw the video on M2 before it became MTV2.battlecatmeowstab212 wrote:
It wasn't huge. Like, it got regular rotation in rap circles, but that and "What U See" got no shine from the likes of MTV whatsoever.
M2 was cool because it was 24 hours of music videos, regardless of genre, and pretty much you never saw two videos from the same genre back to back. i did realize, though, that the 24 hour rotation was actually 8 hours played 3 times a day, which helped me VHS tape many videos from that time, knowing the schedule. Oh, and they never played anything that was running on heavy rotation on regular MTV at the time.
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
I never knew Nas and Jay-z ghost wrote some verses on this... self-
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
There were a lot of self-confessed "real" heads in the London scene that never heard this album at the time for the same reason. I guess a lot of it seemed to come down to snobbery, but it didn't help that Missing Linx flipped that same break, and heads would automatically claim it to be the better version. It's a shame, 'cause they missed out on a cracking album.Y@k Bollocks wrote:Actually, I'm positive I've never listened to it.peanut butter wrote:Y@k Bollocks wrote:Don't think I've ever listened to this album, much as I loved The Chronic.
What in the fuck? Why?
PEACE
I dunno why, really.
I guess when it dropped in '99 I was elbow deep in anything I thought was 'underground' so turned my nose up at guest spots by people like Xzibit and Snoop. Add to that the fact that I was attending hip hop nights like Scratch in London, which catered for a largely white male crowd, so never really got into the singles off it.
And I just never got round to revisiting it.
I'll download it.
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
How has someone not heard 2001? This is blowing my mind.
Classic..... maybe. At the VERY least, some classic tracks. It wasn't revolutionary though.
Classic..... maybe. At the VERY least, some classic tracks. It wasn't revolutionary though.
I <3 Employee.
-
- Posts: 2495
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:38 pm
Re: is dr dre 2001 considered classic?
This threads a trip. be hard pressed to find that many people from my generation who dont know a song verbatim