Audio 101 - Microphone basics
Moderators: TheBigSleep, stype_ones, Philaflava
Audio 101 - Microphone basics
Now, we could talk about microphones, and miking techniques for days. However, this will be a simple introduction.
Firstly,
There are 5 basic directional patterns:
Omni
The simplest mic design will pick up all sound, regardless of its point of origin, and is thus known as an omnidirectional microphone. They are very easy to use and generally have good to outstanding frequency response. If you wanted to mic an entire room, perhaps band practice or something, with one mic, omni would be perfect for this.
Bi-directional (also known as "figure 8")
This is the way any diaphragm (I will explain diaphragm) will behave if sound can strike the front and back equally. The fact that the mic accepts sound from both ends makes it difficult to use in many situations. Most often it is placed above an instrument. * Personally I have never used a bi-drectional pattern. You may find it useful in some cases - especially if you dont have multiple mics.
Cardioid
This pattern is popular for sound reinforcement or recording concerts where audience noise is a possible problem. Now, the point of a cardiod pattern is to pick up sound from directly where it is pointed. The reality is that the pattern is not entirely directional, and you will still pick up sound from the rear of the diaphragm, especially low frequencies.
Regardless, a cardiod pattern is the most usefull for studio operations. Whether it be a guitar, vocals, drums, whatever.. a cardiod will usually work best for you. Its unidirectional and isolates your target, rejecting most unwanted noise.
Supercardioid
A polar pattern name used to describe the pickup pattern of some microphones. The Supercardioid pattern is very similar to, and often confused with, the Hypercardioid pattern. The Supercardioid pattern is slightly less directional than the Hypercardioid pattern, but the rear lobe of sensitivity is also much smaller in the Supercardioid .
Hypercardioid
A polar pattern name typically used to describe microphone pick up characteristics. Hypercardioid patterns are similar to Cardioid and Supercardioid patterns in that the primary sensitivity is in the front of the microphone. They differ, however, in that the point of least sensitivity is at the 150 - 160 and 200 - 210 degree positions (as opposed to directly behind the microphone in a Cardioid pattern). Hypercardioid microphones are thus considered even more directional than Cardioid and Supercardioid microphones. Hypercardioid microphones are frequently used in situations where maximum isolation is desired between sound sources.
*the only time I've ever used Hypercardiod is on a film set with a Shotgun mic. The Hypercardiod pattern is very directional, and you can pick up a conversation 30 yards away if you point the mic directly at the person's mouth. However, you have to be careful.. as you can see, the Hypercardiod pattern picks up sound at 180 degrees.
Okay now we have a basic grasp on different directional patterns. Maybe later we will talk more about a "stereo pair" (basically, this is acheived by placing 2 cardiod mics next to eachother, and angling them so you have 180 degrees of peak signal. Label one Left, and the other Right, and you can mic something in stereo.. like an orchestra for example)
A quick list of mics:
The all time favorite:
The SM58 has a dynamic cardiod pattern. It is unidirectional, ruggedly built, it isolates sound pretty well, and shit, you can mic just about anything with this thing. If you can only buy one mic, and you are broke as fuck, buy this one. It is used for live vocals 99 times out of 100.
SM57:
Much like the 58, the 57 has a slightly wider frequency response, and is usually used for micing instruments like guitars, snares, and bass. The 57 is a touch more directional than the 58, and its "hotter". Its not quite as warm, and does best when placed close to the signal.
SHURE KSM44
I love this goddamn thing. So this mic has an even wider frequency response - 20hz - 20khz (it is said that the human ear cannot process anything lower than 20hz or higher than 20khz.. you will not encounter those frequencies).
The main difference between this (a "studio condenser") and a mic like the 58, is that the KSM has a Large Diapragm. This enables the mic to pick up more sound, and reproduce it much more accurately, although its a bit more fragile. Also, it requires Phantom Power.
This mic can be set to Omni, Cardiod, and Figure 8 patterns. It is great for vocals, instruments, or pretty much any miking situation.
Okay yall those are the basics..
Any questions?
Firstly,
There are 5 basic directional patterns:
Omni
The simplest mic design will pick up all sound, regardless of its point of origin, and is thus known as an omnidirectional microphone. They are very easy to use and generally have good to outstanding frequency response. If you wanted to mic an entire room, perhaps band practice or something, with one mic, omni would be perfect for this.
Bi-directional (also known as "figure 8")
This is the way any diaphragm (I will explain diaphragm) will behave if sound can strike the front and back equally. The fact that the mic accepts sound from both ends makes it difficult to use in many situations. Most often it is placed above an instrument. * Personally I have never used a bi-drectional pattern. You may find it useful in some cases - especially if you dont have multiple mics.
Cardioid
This pattern is popular for sound reinforcement or recording concerts where audience noise is a possible problem. Now, the point of a cardiod pattern is to pick up sound from directly where it is pointed. The reality is that the pattern is not entirely directional, and you will still pick up sound from the rear of the diaphragm, especially low frequencies.
Regardless, a cardiod pattern is the most usefull for studio operations. Whether it be a guitar, vocals, drums, whatever.. a cardiod will usually work best for you. Its unidirectional and isolates your target, rejecting most unwanted noise.
Supercardioid
A polar pattern name used to describe the pickup pattern of some microphones. The Supercardioid pattern is very similar to, and often confused with, the Hypercardioid pattern. The Supercardioid pattern is slightly less directional than the Hypercardioid pattern, but the rear lobe of sensitivity is also much smaller in the Supercardioid .
Hypercardioid
A polar pattern name typically used to describe microphone pick up characteristics. Hypercardioid patterns are similar to Cardioid and Supercardioid patterns in that the primary sensitivity is in the front of the microphone. They differ, however, in that the point of least sensitivity is at the 150 - 160 and 200 - 210 degree positions (as opposed to directly behind the microphone in a Cardioid pattern). Hypercardioid microphones are thus considered even more directional than Cardioid and Supercardioid microphones. Hypercardioid microphones are frequently used in situations where maximum isolation is desired between sound sources.
*the only time I've ever used Hypercardiod is on a film set with a Shotgun mic. The Hypercardiod pattern is very directional, and you can pick up a conversation 30 yards away if you point the mic directly at the person's mouth. However, you have to be careful.. as you can see, the Hypercardiod pattern picks up sound at 180 degrees.
Okay now we have a basic grasp on different directional patterns. Maybe later we will talk more about a "stereo pair" (basically, this is acheived by placing 2 cardiod mics next to eachother, and angling them so you have 180 degrees of peak signal. Label one Left, and the other Right, and you can mic something in stereo.. like an orchestra for example)
A quick list of mics:
The all time favorite:
The SM58 has a dynamic cardiod pattern. It is unidirectional, ruggedly built, it isolates sound pretty well, and shit, you can mic just about anything with this thing. If you can only buy one mic, and you are broke as fuck, buy this one. It is used for live vocals 99 times out of 100.
SM57:
Much like the 58, the 57 has a slightly wider frequency response, and is usually used for micing instruments like guitars, snares, and bass. The 57 is a touch more directional than the 58, and its "hotter". Its not quite as warm, and does best when placed close to the signal.
SHURE KSM44
I love this goddamn thing. So this mic has an even wider frequency response - 20hz - 20khz (it is said that the human ear cannot process anything lower than 20hz or higher than 20khz.. you will not encounter those frequencies).
The main difference between this (a "studio condenser") and a mic like the 58, is that the KSM has a Large Diapragm. This enables the mic to pick up more sound, and reproduce it much more accurately, although its a bit more fragile. Also, it requires Phantom Power.
This mic can be set to Omni, Cardiod, and Figure 8 patterns. It is great for vocals, instruments, or pretty much any miking situation.
Okay yall those are the basics..
Any questions?
Last edited by KaeoFLUX on Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Hasenfefer
- Posts: 8907
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 9:49 pm
- Location: south florida
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 1:35 pm
- Location: The Brain Kave, NY
- Contact:
yo k
yo k, what kind of mic is a rode nt2... going by your diagramsim not sure what kind of condenser mic it is... cardioid, cardiac, trapezoid, creepozoid... hahaha, hola back, i dunno if this info will effect me, but i got a rode nt2.... that shit good? sounds good to me. ha
btw... i may have to hit u up about remastering my album... im adding a couple joints takin away a few and prolly gonna re-release it on sum semiofficial tip. get at me. pz
btw... i may have to hit u up about remastering my album... im adding a couple joints takin away a few and prolly gonna re-release it on sum semiofficial tip. get at me. pz
unAuthordox's "Help... The Ep LP" available at www.ughh.com/store, www.cdbaby.com/cd/unauthordox, www.towerrecords.com
-"fuse one... dood smokes a blunt like a chick holds a virginia slim. "
-"fuse one... dood smokes a blunt like a chick holds a virginia slim. "
Re: yo k
The Rode nt2 is a large diaphragm studio condeser, just like the Shure KSM44 above. The freq. response is 20-20 like the Shure as well. The Rode has Omni and Cardiod patterns.. no Figure 8 which you probably wont need anyways.unAuthorDeezy wrote:yo k, what kind of mic is a rode nt2... going by your diagramsim not sure what kind of condenser mic it is... cardioid, cardiac, trapezoid, creepozoid... hahaha, hola back, i dunno if this info will effect me, but i got a rode nt2.... that shit good? sounds good to me. ha
btw... i may have to hit u up about remastering my album... im adding a couple joints takin away a few and prolly gonna re-release it on sum semiofficial tip. get at me. pz
I've recorded vocals on the Rode and it sounds great. Its lacks a little high end brightness and brilliance, which in my opinion makes it a great hip hop vocal mic.. but not the best for all around use. Regardless.. a great mic at a great price.
Oh and hit up my email about that mastering and shit
flux@kaeoflux.com
-
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:52 am
- Location: Upper Beaches, Toronto
-
- some schmuck
- Posts: 1937
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:23 pm
- Contact:
Ive never used it, but here is what I've heard:MASTER416 wrote:I'm not too familiar with mic's and technical shit, I decided to pic up a mic and wanted to know what your opinion on it was, Kaeoflux.
I have an Apex 460.
Good? Bad?
Lots of users complain about a "weird" high end.. almost false brightness. Also problems with sibilance. This is probably due to the Apex having a professional and high end design, but its built with cheap parts. Tube mics usually demand quality parts. Lots of people who have the Apex reccoment modifications or retrofitting if that's your cup of tea.
High end engineers dont like the Apex as is, out of the box. Although according to a few tests, the Apex has done very well with vocals, and for the price, it competes with mics at threee times the price.
All in all, it seems like you got a very idiosyncratic microphone, so it will all come down to two things 1) your preference, 2) your chain (outboard gear like compressors and preamps, pop filters)
peac!
p.s. compression settings for vocals. There is no such universal "great setting", but try this:
Threshold: -10 or -8 db
Ratio: 5:1
Attack: 2
Release: 60
That should hold your loud pops down a few db, but shouldn't crush your sound (unless your signal is too hot..)
Personally, I have had great results with a post-recording hard limiter, usually at about -8 db, depending on your levels. I'm not a fan of over-compressed vocals. (its all about technique on the mic! compress yourself)
-
- Posts: 4445
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 11:04 pm
- Contact:
I dunno about your SM 57 and 58 comparisons...
SM 57's and 58's are the same mic, just one has a ball pop filter over it (the 58) and the other doesnt, but can also be screwed open halfway up the handle, and be taped a certain way to allow a a better miking angle for a snare (or even a sloppy drummer)
their polar patterns and frequency responses are exactly the same...
you'd probably then say to yourself this questions: "well if they are the same then why make two different kinds?"
well the SM58 with the pop filter is more or less a VOCAL MIC, so the pop filter screen on windscreen blocks your P's and whatnot...it can also handle more stage abuse...
the 57 is like the way it is, because it's better for miking and a pop filter renders useless and just gets in the way, also if you were to take off the 58s windscreen and accidentally hit it with a drum stick you'd prolly fuck it up a lot more than you would just hitting a 57...
SM 57's and 58's are the same mic, just one has a ball pop filter over it (the 58) and the other doesnt, but can also be screwed open halfway up the handle, and be taped a certain way to allow a a better miking angle for a snare (or even a sloppy drummer)
their polar patterns and frequency responses are exactly the same...
you'd probably then say to yourself this questions: "well if they are the same then why make two different kinds?"
well the SM58 with the pop filter is more or less a VOCAL MIC, so the pop filter screen on windscreen blocks your P's and whatnot...it can also handle more stage abuse...
the 57 is like the way it is, because it's better for miking and a pop filter renders useless and just gets in the way, also if you were to take off the 58s windscreen and accidentally hit it with a drum stick you'd prolly fuck it up a lot more than you would just hitting a 57...
Apex is carp, bro. No offense. They're like that new Scion sports coupe. Look flossy on the outside, but suck on the inside.MASTER416 wrote:I'm not too familiar with mic's and technical shit, I decided to pic up a mic and wanted to know what your opinion on it was, Kaeoflux.
I have an Apex 460.
Good? Bad?
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 12:59 am
- Contact:
Re: yo k
I just read this in theMay/June Version of TapeOp:KaeoFLUX wrote:I've recorded vocals on the Rode and it sounds great. Its lacks a little high end brightness and brilliance, which in my opinion makes it a great hip hop vocal mic.. but not the best for all around use. Regardless.. a great mic at a great price.unAuthorDeezy wrote:yo k, what kind of mic is a rode nt2...
(Interview with guys from hotel2tango studio)
Hmmmmm. Sounds like a sweet mic for around $700 list (The U87 costs around $3,200 list). I have only worked with an NT2 once but I liked what I heard.Efrim Menuck: Can we all agree, however, that the Rode NT2 is an excellent mic?
Howard Bilerman: ...We put the Rode side by side with a U87 that someone brought in to record with.
A Neumann U87?
H: Right, so basically a mic costing about four times the price of the NT2.
Thierry Amar: Yeah, and we tested them for about an hour with different voices.
E:I mean, A/B-ing it, you could hear the mute switch, but otherwise you couldn't tell the difference. Mute switch notwithstanding the difference was inaudible.
Also BSW lists the NT2 as having multiple polar patterns including omni, cardioid, and figure 8.
Re: yo k
these guys are fuckin tripping.DeffEnders wrote:I just read this in theMay/June Version of TapeOp:KaeoFLUX wrote:I've recorded vocals on the Rode and it sounds great. Its lacks a little high end brightness and brilliance, which in my opinion makes it a great hip hop vocal mic.. but not the best for all around use. Regardless.. a great mic at a great price.unAuthorDeezy wrote:yo k, what kind of mic is a rode nt2...
(Interview with guys from hotel2tango studio)
Hmmmmm. Sounds like a sweet mic for around $700 list (The U87 costs around $3,200 list). I have only worked with an NT2 once but I liked what I heard.Efrim Menuck: Can we all agree, however, that the Rode NT2 is an excellent mic?
Howard Bilerman: ...We put the Rode side by side with a U87 that someone brought in to record with.
A Neumann U87?
H: Right, so basically a mic costing about four times the price of the NT2.
Thierry Amar: Yeah, and we tested them for about an hour with different voices.
E:I mean, A/B-ing it, you could hear the mute switch, but otherwise you couldn't tell the difference. Mute switch notwithstanding the difference was inaudible.
Also BSW lists the NT2 as having multiple polar patterns including omni, cardioid, and figure 8.
the U87 kills the Rode, sorry. (But again who knows what preamps and such there were running through)
I've also heard people say the Studio Projects B2 ($200) sounds identical to the U87. It's like, damn, leave the 87 alone mangs!