USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Discuss all sports including fantasy and online gambling.

Moderator: Gregg Popabitch

Post Reply
Tired & Broke
Posts: 3720
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:38 am
Location: Bible Belt Misery
Contact:

USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Tired & Broke »

Declaring "enough is enough," Lance Armstrong says he will not fight charges brought by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which said it will ban Armstrong from competition for life and strip him of the seven Tour de France titles that turned him into an American hero.

Lance Armstrong, shown here in February competing in a triathlon in Panama, decided on Thursday not to go to arbitration to dispute charges brought by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which alleges the cyclist for years engaged in a blood-doping conspiracy.

Arnulfo Franco, AP

Lance Armstrong, shown here in February competing in a triathlon in Panama, decided on Thursday not to go to arbitration to dispute charges brought by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which alleges the cyclist for years engaged in a blood-doping conspiracy.

Enlarge

Arnulfo Franco, AP

Lance Armstrong, shown here in February competing in a triathlon in Panama, decided on Thursday not to go to arbitration to dispute charges brought by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which alleges the cyclist for years engaged in a blood-doping conspiracy.

Armstrong said his decision did not mean he would accept USADA's sanctions. His lawyers threatened a lawsuit if USADA proceeded, arguing the agency must first resolve a dispute with the International Cycling Union over whether the case should be pursued.

"It is a sad day for all of us who love sport and our athletic heroes," USADA CEO Travis Tygart said. "This is a heartbreaking example of how the win-at-all-costs culture of sport, if left unchecked, will overtake fair, safe and honest competition."

MORE: Full statement from Lance Armstrong
PHOTOS: Armstrong in pictures
COLUMN: Brennan: Lance now a cheater

In walking away, the 40-year-old Armstrong cited a familiar defense: he has never tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs. He said his decision is not an admission of guilt, but a choice to devote more time to his family and his Livestrong foundation for cancer survivors. Armstrong overcame advanced cancer just a few years before his string of Tour de France victories.

"I know who won those seven Tours," Armstrong said in a statement. "The toughest event in the world where the strongest man wins. Nobody can ever change that. Especially Travis Tygart."

Armstrong said he will "commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities."

Jeffery C. Garvey, board member of Livestrong, says the charity supports his decision and looks forward to his future work. "Lance's legacy in the cancer community is unparalleled," Garvey said in a statement.

MORE: Lance Armstrong time line
MORE: Letter from Armstrong's lawyer

The news caught many riders at the USA Pro Cycling race in Colorado off guard. Armstrong's entire RadioShack-Trek squad declined comment. The team, returning to their hotel from dinner, hurried into an elevator.

Bissell Pro Cyling team member Ben Jacques-Maynes, who has raced as a pro in the United States since 2002, called it "huge" news.

"This is bigger than Floyd (Lanids), Tyler (Hamilton) and (Alberto) Contador put together," he said from the USA Pro Cycling race in Colorado. "I hope this will be the first step to realizing how poisoned this sport has been and how far we still need to come in order to move on."

On Monday, a federal judge dismissed Armstrong's case against USADA and said the agency can rightfully claim jurisdiction over the cyclist's case. Judge Sam Sparks also rejected Armstrong's claim that the arbitration process was biased, ruling that the cyclist must seek victory there before asking a court to intervene, as Armstrong agreed to do in applying for cycling licenses. Sparks did raise several issues of fairness in USADA's "vague" charging letter, but said those issues could be argued as part of the arbitration.

Armstrong declined, saying, "I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and unfair" and said USADA has "zero physical evidence" to support its "outlandish and heinous claims."

Instead, Armstrong attorney Tim Herman fired a letter off to USADA Thursday that suggested Armstrong would sue if USADA moves to sanction him. "You are on notice that if USADA makes any public statement claiming, without jurisdiction, to sanction Mr. Armstrong, or to falsely characterize Mr. Armstrong's reasons for not requesting an arbitration as anything other than a recognition of UCI jurisdiction and authority, USADA and anyone involved in the making of the statement will be liable," Herman wrote.

Herman told USADA it could submit its case against Armstrong to UCI or the international Court of Arbitration for Sport, based in Switzerland.

By declining to go to arbitration, Armstrong and his legal team sent the message that he no longer wants to participate in a fight he doesn't consider fair. After years of rumors and accusations of cheating, many people already had made up their mind about him - a point that wasn't lost on Armstrong.

His charity has enjoyed strong support despite the doping allegations, though Armstrong's popularity has slipped, according to Q Scores, which measures the likeability of celebrities.

Sanctions against Armstrong could mark the end of a long sporting saga that once captivated the world. A native of Austin, Texas, Armstrong successful fight against cancer and remarkable career inspired millions of other survivors and gave rise to Livestrong and its iconic yellow bracelets.

Armstrong previously was subject of a federal investigation into whether he committed fraud while on the USPS team, not whether he doped. That investigation was stopped earlier this year with no charges filed. USADA then brought its own non-criminal case against Armstrong, citing its authority to protect the integrity of sports as authorized by Congress.

Armstrong described it as "Tygart's unconstitutional witch hunt."

USADA has consistently said its mission is to keep sports clean and that Armstrong was being handled like any other accused athlete. The agency said Armstrong should be held to the same rules as everybody else and should not have "a new set of rules that apply only to him."

In its letter of charges dated June 12, USADA accused Armstrong of being part of a sophisticated doping conspiracy involving five other members from his U.S. Postal Service cycling team, including doctors, a trainer and coach.

Two declined to fight, leading to swift lifetime bans from USADA. The other three decided to fight the charges in arbitration.

Jim Ochowicz, who managed Armstrong on the Motorola team, declined to comment directly on Armstrong's decision. He said cycling had "moved on."

"As far as the sport is concerned, this is something that has been in play since 1999," he said. "It's a long story, and quite frankly the sport has moved on to other things. This is old news."

Contributing: Fred Dreier in Colorado.

:ohsh: :ohsh: :ohsh: :ohsh: :ohsh:

chump change
The Mayor
Posts: 9966
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:08 am
Location: eighty duece on my shoulder

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by chump change »

U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which said it will ban Armstrong from competition for life and strip him of the seven Tour de France titles that turned him into an American hero.


overall.. i think lance played this the right way... better to just say fuck it.. everyone has already made up their mind about the issue.. so why try and fight it...

H.E.
Posts: 394
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Oslo

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by H.E. »

about time

User avatar
Philaflava
King of The DPB'rs
Posts: 81367
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
Contact:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Philaflava »

He said his decision is not an admission of guilt
exactly what it is.

peanut butter
Posts: 14678
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:08 am

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by peanut butter »

chump change wrote:everyone has already made up their mind about the issue.


PEACE

User avatar
Req
Posts: 13439
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:16 am
Location: Project Windows

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Req »

Philaflava wrote:
He said his decision is not an admission of guilt
exactly what it is.
F.U. MOOLAH

bmurf75
Posts: 1189
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: FL

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by bmurf75 »

He's guilty as hell but really who cares. The teams that came in second were likely doping, the teams that came in third were likely doping, as so on. Cycling is the dirtiest sport in the world.

-

alpha
Posts: 13704
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by alpha »

In 10 years no one will even remember this.

User avatar
Philaflava
King of The DPB'rs
Posts: 81367
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
Contact:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Philaflava »

He doesn't lose any of that $ and even though Livestrong is a great cause, to think he hasn't benefited from it would be crazy.

American Flyers yo!

naturalborn103
Posts: 13774
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:18 am
Location: boston
Contact:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by naturalborn103 »

bmurf75 wrote:He's guilty as hell but really who cares. The teams that came in second were likely doping, the teams that came in third were likely doping, as so on. Cycling is the dirtiest sport in the world.

-
Yea.. Is it really cheating if everyone is doing it?

Moolah
The Rap Yahoo Serious
Posts: 30580
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:40 am

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Moolah »

naturalborn103 wrote:
bmurf75 wrote:He's guilty as hell but really who cares. The teams that came in second were likely doping, the teams that came in third were likely doping, as so on. Cycling is the dirtiest sport in the world.

-
Yea.. Is it really cheating if everyone is doing it?
Yes.

User avatar
Positive A
Posts: 12600
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:13 am
Location: :ohcanada:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Positive A »

bmurf75 wrote:He's guilty as hell but really who cares...its fucking bicycling. He has one ball and rides a bike.

User avatar
Positive A
Posts: 12600
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:13 am
Location: :ohcanada:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Positive A »

For reals though, this is all that matters:
Req wrote:
Philaflava wrote:
He said his decision is not an admission of guilt
exactly what it is.
Live Strong Bracelets <

Trademark
oil baron swaggasaurus
Posts: 19683
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:37 pm

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Trademark »

Never failed a drug test.

Dat_Triflin_Ass_Dude
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:42 pm

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by Dat_Triflin_Ass_Dude »

people give a shit about cycling?

DLG
Posts: 12482
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:27 am

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by DLG »

bmurf75 wrote:He's guilty as hell but really who cares. The teams that came in second were likely doping, the teams that came in third were likely doping, as so on. Cycling is the dirtiest sport in the world.

-

capable_keL
phila HR Champ
Posts: 21623
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
Contact:

Re: USADA lays the ban hammer on Lance Armstrong

Post by capable_keL »

he beat cancer, wtf. get off his dick. who the fuck would bike without using something or everything

dumb fucks
Hey, by the way who's Curt?

Post Reply