OMNI wrote:
This thread is silly, Nash couldn't hold Stockton's jockstrap. Do you think Stockton would have gotten badly out played by Tony Parker in his prime?
"wrote off as a John Stockton Clone"
Moderator: Gregg Popabitch
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
don't underestimate amareCash Rulz wrote:Nash is better at dribble penetration than Stockton.
Stockton was just smarter so he figured ways to get the ball to the open man without it.
Understand also, an assist is only an assist when the person you pass to scores. So it must also be taken under consideration that Stockton did often pass the ball to someone who was able to make their shots and shot much higher percentages than anyone that Nash is passing to.
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
yeah malone is better then anyone nash might have now. but also remember, nash has more toys to play with and a more up tempo offense then stockton has ever played with as well. GAME OVER
Damn. This floored me. I really agreed with Cash until I read this.Gregg Popabitch wrote: don't underestimate amare
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
yeah malone is better then anyone nash might have now. but also remember, nash has more toys to play with and a more up tempo offense then stockton has ever played with as well. GAME OVER
"George Bush doesn't care about black people."
-Kanye West
-Kanye West
-
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 4:02 pm
yeah but stockton's whole O was based on pick and rolls where he would dump the ball off to malone for a 15 footer or drive and dish it out to Hornicek or whoever else was at the 3Gregg Popabitch wrote:don't underestimate amareCash Rulz wrote:Nash is better at dribble penetration than Stockton.
Stockton was just smarter so he figured ways to get the ball to the open man without it.
Understand also, an assist is only an assist when the person you pass to scores. So it must also be taken under consideration that Stockton did often pass the ball to someone who was able to make their shots and shot much higher percentages than anyone that Nash is passing to.
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
yeah malone is better then anyone nash might have now. but also remember, nash has more toys to play with and a more up tempo offense then stockton has ever played with as well. GAME OVER
While Malone made Stockton better...Nash makes Amare/Marion/Q Rich/JJ better
stockton is still better though
-
- I'll Just STFU Now!
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 2:01 am
- Contact:
in Stockton's best 5yrs he averaged more PPG than Nash, a full 2assists a game more
and actually could you know play defense
Stockton is a better scorer, better passer, better defender .. and Nash isn't worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as Stock
Stock puts up 17ppg 18apg if he is in his late80's form for the Suns this yr
face it Nash won an MVP this year with a season that might be better than Stockton's ...9th best year
and actually could you know play defense
Stockton is a better scorer, better passer, better defender .. and Nash isn't worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as Stock
Stock puts up 17ppg 18apg if he is in his late80's form for the Suns this yr
face it Nash won an MVP this year with a season that might be better than Stockton's ...9th best year
-
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 4:02 pm
its a different gameeternalreflection wrote:in Stockton's best 5yrs he averaged more PPG than Nash, a full 2assists a game more
and actually could you know play defense
Stockton is a better scorer, better passer, better defender .. and Nash isn't worthy of being mentioned in the same sentence as Stock
Stock puts up 17ppg 18apg if he is in his late80's form for the Suns this yr
face it Nash won an MVP this year with a season that might be better than Stockton's ...9th best year
just like it wasn't uncommon for people to get 15+ rebounds
add to the fact that he had one of the greatest if not the greatest PF to ever play...his assists all coming off a pick and roll where he would be in control of who scored EVERY play...stockton is still better, but ya'll act like nash didn't have a great season(Still not MVP worthy though)
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
he only plalyed with hornacek for like 4-5 seasons. other years it was jeff malone, john starks, and i think hersey hawkins.Peeping Tom wrote:yeah but stockton's whole O was based on pick and rolls where he would dump the ball off to malone for a 15 footer or drive and dish it out to Hornicek or whoever else was at the 3Gregg Popabitch wrote:don't underestimate amareCash Rulz wrote:Nash is better at dribble penetration than Stockton.
Stockton was just smarter so he figured ways to get the ball to the open man without it.
Understand also, an assist is only an assist when the person you pass to scores. So it must also be taken under consideration that Stockton did often pass the ball to someone who was able to make their shots and shot much higher percentages than anyone that Nash is passing to.
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
yeah malone is better then anyone nash might have now. but also remember, nash has more toys to play with and a more up tempo offense then stockton has ever played with as well. GAME OVER
While Malone made Stockton better...Nash makes Amare/Marion/Q Rich/JJ better
stockton is still better though
-
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 4:02 pm
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
that first comment deserves an asterisk. we should all pretend those two years w/o jordan never happened. lol.Peeping Tom wrote:you know the same PF that was on the NBA 1st team more than JordanSankofa wrote:Tim Duncan?Peeping Tom wrote:he had one of the greatest if not the greatest PF to ever play
Was a top 10 rb and scorere EVER!
top 10 scorer, perhaps. top 10 rebounder ever? eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek, let me see.
chamberlain
russell
rodman
jerry lucas
nate thurmond
moses malone
walt bellamy
wes unseld
barkley
elvin hayes
hakeem olajuwon
kareem
elgin baylor
off the top of my head.
Without Stockton setting him up, Karl Malone wouldn't have come close to sniffing the top 10 scoring ranks. As many points and rebounds and weights as he's moved, he's still soft. I'd take Duncan in a heartbeat, even with his Malone rookie year foul shot technique. Maybe Teeem needs to start muttering under his breath?Peeping Tom wrote:Karl MaloneSankofa wrote:Tim Duncan?Peeping Tom wrote:he had one of the greatest if not the greatest PF to ever play
yeah that PF
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
interesting fact.Sankofa wrote:Without Stockton setting him up, Karl Malone wouldn't have come close to sniffing the top 10 scoring ranks. As many points and rebounds and weights as he's moved, he's still soft. I'd take Duncan in a heartbeat, even with his Malone rookie year foul shot technique. Maybe Teeem needs to start muttering under his breath?Peeping Tom wrote:Karl MaloneSankofa wrote:Tim Duncan?Peeping Tom wrote:he had one of the greatest if not the greatest PF to ever play
yeah that PF
tim duncan has been on the NBA All First Team every year he's been in the NBA.
-
- Voice of Reason
- Posts: 13524
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 11:06 am
- Location: Your girl's house
- Contact:
Its not about underestimating Amare. But he's not as good a shooter as Malone was.Gregg Popabitch wrote:don't underestimate amareCash Rulz wrote:Nash is better at dribble penetration than Stockton.
Stockton was just smarter so he figured ways to get the ball to the open man without it.
Understand also, an assist is only an assist when the person you pass to scores. So it must also be taken under consideration that Stockton did often pass the ball to someone who was able to make their shots and shot much higher percentages than anyone that Nash is passing to.
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
yeah malone is better then anyone nash might have now. but also remember, nash has more toys to play with and a more up tempo offense then stockton has ever played with as well. GAME OVER
All the others you mentioned are streaky. Excellent potential amongst them, but they don't step up as often as they should. I would say they are probably more athletic than whoever Stockton had, but they weren't better shooters. (see Peeping Tom)
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
you're crazy. yeah, malone over amare. given.Cash Rulz wrote:All the others you mentioned are streaky. Excellent potential amongst them, but they don't step up as often as they should. I would say they are probably more athletic than whoever Stockton had, but they weren't better shooters. (see Peeping Tom)
but name a single player that stockton had that was nastier offensively then marion, JJ, and Q.
and i'm a huge hornacek fan.
-
- Posts: 9469
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:53 pm
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 9469
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:53 pm
- CarlosDelgothoes
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:29 am
Re: "wrote off as a John Stockton Clone"
lolthread
Re: "wrote off as a John Stockton Clone"
Hahaha. How did you remember this?
Re: "wrote off as a John Stockton Clone"
great ressurrect
every team the jazz played against knew what was coming all day ere day. but they couldn't stop it because Stockton is the greatest ball distributor of all time
every team the jazz played against knew what was coming all day ere day. but they couldn't stop it because Stockton is the greatest ball distributor of all time
-
- phila HR Champ
- Posts: 21623
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
- Contact:
Re:
Gregg Popabitch wrote:
don't underestimate amare
and marion
and Q
and both JJs.
Hey, by the way who's Curt?