Are These Movies Classic?

Discuss the world of entertainment; movies, tv, journalism and radio.

Moderator: drizzle

chump change
The Mayor
Posts: 9966
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:08 am
Location: eighty duece on my shoulder

Re: Are These Movies Classic?

Post by chump change »

TeenageMoustache wrote:
Icesickle wrote:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind No
HEAT No
Gangs of New York No
Rushmore Yes
Being John Malcovich Maybe
Adaptation Maybe
The Thin Red Line No
Saving Private Ryan No
Kill Bill (the whole thing together) No
City of God Yes
American Beauty No
The Matrix Yes
Fight Club No
Mulholland Drive Yes
Memento Maybe
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy No
Requim for a Dream No
The Incredibles Maybe
Finding Nemo Maybe
kill bill not a classic, but finding nemo maybe?

wtf? lol

ThaJim2
Posts: 7074
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:43 pm

Re: Are These Movies Classic?

Post by ThaJim2 »

chump change wrote:
kill bill not a classic, but finding nemo maybe?

wtf? lol
What is hard to understand about that? Belly of the Beast is a classic to me while i cant stand West Side Story but i know that West Side Story is a classic to the general public and critics and Belly of the Beast is not.

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

ThaJim2 wrote:
Icesickle wrote:

I'm really suprised that more people aren't co-signing L.A. Confidential. It's a great film on every level which was well received by the public and critics alike. And there's no way a film Rushmore doesn't go down a classic...it's a 90s Annie Hall or Manhattan.
LA Confidentials problem is not enough people have seen it. If it was on tv as much as say Shawshank it would be a classic as it is a much better movie. Rushmore is pretentious shit and I believe the Wes Anderson/self indulgent bullshit movement backlash is on.
Manhattan and Annie Hall are pretentious as shit as well...but that doesn't mean they aren't regarded as classics by a lot of people.

RacquetballGangsta
Posts: 10905
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 9:04 pm
Location: A satellite, bitch! I'm just that fly.
Contact:

Post by RacquetballGangsta »

rushmore doesnt deserve to spoken of in the same breath as annie hall or manhattan

but i think u make a valid point, as lots of numbskulls love that movie, thus classic status.
twitter.com/deweydimbabwe
www.stonesthrow.com/vex

nett ist der kleine bruder von scheiße

ThaJim2
Posts: 7074
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:43 pm

Post by ThaJim2 »

Icesickle wrote: Manhattan and Annie Hall are pretentious as shit as well...but that doesn't mean they aren't regarded as classics by a lot of people.
That is just east coast bias on why woodie allen movies are called classics.

cascarrabias
Posts: 12779
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:32 pm
Location: NY

Post by cascarrabias »

Rushmore is great. Maybe his best.

Tweak Da Leak
Posts: 10257
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:03 am
Location: Throwin up dubs like Ice Cube

Post by Tweak Da Leak »

people actually liked the LOTR trilogy?!@??!?!?!

Truth.
Posts: 8004
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 10:39 pm
Location: St. Louis

Post by Truth. »

Tweak Da Leak wrote:people actually liked the LOTR trilogy?!@??!?!?!
people actually didn't?

oh wait only nerds are supposed to enjoy it :roll:

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

Tweak Da Leak wrote:people actually liked the LOTR trilogy?!@??!?!?!
The question wasn't whether you even like the movies; it's whether the movies are going to be viewed as classics.

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

what a retarded question, especially without designating any criteria. what would actually constitute a classic? some of the movies named will be getting constant replay from the average joe 10 years from now without ever being placed on any kind of top critical position (fight club, memento), while some others will be all over top list but long forgotten by the general public (ice storm). which one of these categories should be considered as the 'real deal' indicator? only 3 of those maybe will actually make the cut if both sides are taken into consideration
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

ObeseJesus
Posts: 4238
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:37 pm
Location: honolulu

Re: Are These Movies Classic?

Post by ObeseJesus »

Personally:
Icesickle wrote: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind NO
Mystic River NO
Heat YES
Gangs of New York NO
Rushmore MAYBE
Being John Malcovich MAYBE
Adaptation NO
The Thin Red Line NO
Saving Private Ryan YES
Kill Bill (the whole thing together) NO
The Passion of the Christ YES
American Beauty YES
The Matrix YES
Ice Storm NO
L.A. Confidential NO
Fight Club YES
Mulholland Drive NO
Memento NO
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy NO
Requim for a Dream YES
The IncrediblesNO
Finding Nemo NO
But imho, the concept of "classic" as a non-personalized, socially agreed upon status symbol for art= teh ghey

ObeseJesus
Posts: 4238
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:37 pm
Location: honolulu

Post by ObeseJesus »

Any of these classics?

Se7en
Snatch
Donnie Darko
25th Hour
Dead Presidents
Natural Born Killers
Kids
Trainspotting
American History X

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

trainspotting probably

the rest have either a lot of cult appeal and/or a large popular following, but i would not call any of them classic in the sence that for example goodfellas is a classic
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

Seiko Flossberg
Posts: 9486
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Where one of the greatest MC's was a local cat

Post by Seiko Flossberg »

RacquetballGangsta wrote:rushmore doesnt deserve to spoken of in the same breath as annie hall or manhattan

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

drizzle wrote:trainspotting probably

the rest have either a lot of cult appeal and/or a large popular following, but i would not call any of them classic in the sence that for example goodfellas is a classic
I agree with everything you said except that you made an exception for Trainspotting, which is a cult movie like the rest of them.

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

drizzle wrote:what a retarded question, especially without designating any criteria. what would actually constitute a classic? some of the movies named will be getting constant replay from the average joe 10 years from now without ever being placed on any kind of top critical position (fight club, memento), while some others will be all over top list but long forgotten by the general public (ice storm). which one of these categories should be considered as the 'real deal' indicator? only 3 of those maybe will actually make the cut if both sides are taken into consideration
It's pretty simple really drizzle. Some movies from the 90s, like Pulp Fiction, Goodfellas, Unforgiven, Fargo, and Schindler's List, are already generally regarded as "classics." I'm asking which one of the movies that I listed will be placed alongside them in years to come.

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

nah, trainspotting is better than that. it goes waay beyond the usual drug movie on all accounts
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

ThaJim2
Posts: 7074
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:43 pm

Post by ThaJim2 »

drizzle wrote:trainspotting probably

the rest have either a lot of cult appeal and/or a large popular following, but i would not call any of them classic in the sence that for example goodfellas is a classic
I agree for the most part but think 25th hour has a good chance to go down as a classic and seven has an outside chance.

Post Reply