Page 1 of 1

Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 2:23 pm
by Spartan
"A touch of the Dunkirk spirit, know what I mean?"


Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:12 pm
by alpha
Wasn't feeling this. Teaser had me excited but this looks like he just wants to check a war movie off his list.

Edit: autocorrect

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:17 pm
by drizzle
I might be kinda over Nolan, had little interest in Interstellar and this one doesn't really move me either

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:35 pm
by EMCEE DARTH MALEK
you'd think "saving private ryan" meets "titanic" would be a good idea but

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:43 am
by Ramen
the teaser they had released earlier looks promising but I'm not sure now. I'll wait for HBO

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:20 pm
by samdoom
not a big war movie fan but Nolan tackling the subject with imax footage makes it worthy of checking out in the theater

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2017 2:57 pm
by the dead poet
Saw this on thursday. Wasn't really even a war movie as much as a survival type movie. But I dug it. Was short as fuck....but I liked it.

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:12 pm
by ric
fucking good shit. Zimmer + Nolan = fucking dope

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2017 11:44 pm
by the dead poet
I honestly hated what Zimmer did. That ticking clock shit was throwing off my attention. No joke I asked my chick wtf was that noise before realizing it was in the movie.

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:32 am
by admiral
Liked it other than the Spitfire scenes, which seemed to drag on forever
Not really sure why Tom Hardy had to land his fucking plane 200 miles down the beach and away from all of the soldiers being rescued. Seems like he deserved to be captured by the Germans

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 1:44 pm
by the dead poet
admiral wrote:Liked it other than the Spitfire scenes, which seemed to drag on forever
Not really sure why Tom Hardy had to land his fucking plane 200 miles down the beach and away from all of the soldiers being rescued. Seems like he deserved to be captured by the Germans
yea man, that was fucking stupid. He flew right over all the rescue yachts and shit.

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:27 am
by ric
nolan and his camera people; very underrated photographers though.

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:21 pm
by zombie
saw it this weekend
a lot of memorable scenes in this movie
tom hardy was great
i feel like im the only one that didnt care about harry styles afting, despite ALL the fucking abnoxious articles hyping him up. he was mediocre.

also i felt like the cillian murphey storyline, and some other portions of the film, didnt have have that "lets go backward in time" thing that Christopher Nolan likes to do in his movies. it just wasnt necessary.

regardless, the movie was great, would recommend it and re-watch it for sure.

Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:07 pm
by drizzle
surprisingly loved the shit out of it, easily Nolan's best movie imo

There are a few thing off in retrospect, already mentioned here - Tom Hardy's ending is a head scratchier that pulls things toward a kind of romantic realism that doesn't happen anywhere else in the movie, the George/Cilian Murphy thing doesn't quite gel (although I see what they were going for) and it feels like they could've done a bit more than this with the civilian boats section. And the whole movie in general has a faint feel of pro-British propaganda, although that doesn't detract from its effectiveness as a thriller/survival movie nor from the masterclass of direction that Nolan puts on. As a theater experience it's tremendous, I think I'm going to see it again in 70mm Imax.