The Life Obsessive With Wes Anderson

Discuss the world of entertainment; movies, tv, journalism and radio.

Moderator: drizzle

Post Reply
Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

The Life Obsessive With Wes Anderson

Post by Icesickle »

http://nymag.com/movies/filmfestivals/n ... 007/38024/

Image

The Life Obsessive With Wes Anderson
On a spur-of-the-moment train ride to Rome with the filmmaker whose reality bears a distinct resemblance to his movies.


Wes Anderson did not know where he was going. The problem was not that he was lost, but that his mind kept wandering, darting off in too many directions at onceג€”a common and not entirely unwelcome problem for the 38-year-old director. Part of him wanted to stick around Venice for another day or two, now that the Venice Film Festival was over and the promotional business surrounding The Darjeeling Limited, his new film, was behind him. He liked Venice, liked the whole idea of wandering the catacomblike streets of a city that should have been swallowed up by the Adriatic centuries ago. But there was talk of moving the party elsewhereג€”to Paris, maybe, where he has kept an apartment since 2005; or perhaps to Rome, where some friends were heading. Eventually Anderson would have to figure out a way back to Manhattan, his other semi-permanent residence, in time for Darjeeling to open the New York Film Festival, but logistical details like that were, for the time being, best left out of the picture.

ג€œIג€™m thinking Rome,ג€ he eventually said, as if Rome were an appetizer he frequently orders, and twelve hours later he finds himself here: on a train bound for the Eternal City, joined by Roman Coppola and his girlfriend, Jennifer Furches. Coppola and Furches are the directorג€™s old friends who, like most of his old friends, double as frequent collaborators. This is the dynamic at the heart of what those close to him affectionately refer to as ג€œWesג€™s world,ג€ which resembles a vaudevillian family by way of Evelyn Waugh. Coppola, for example, is the cousin of Jason Schwartzman, the star of Andersonג€™s Rushmore, and together the three of them wrote the script for Darjeeling. (Furches was script supervisor.)

That we happen to be traveling by train to discuss a movie that takes place on a train was not part of the original plan, though Iג€™m starting to think of it as yet another example of Andersonג€™s knack for retouching reality with an idiosyncratic gloss. (It may be connected to his fear of flying as well; until recently, Anderson traveled to Europe by boat, and he far prefers trains and automobiles to anything airborne.) Also somewhat peculiar is the fact that buried in one of Andersonג€™s monogrammed suitcases is 10,000 euros in cashג€”about $14,000ג€”an amount that may or may not be legal to carry, and that was given to the director by Bill Murray, who asked that the money be ג€œdelivered to Luigi.ג€

ג€œItג€™s not as weird as it sounds. Luigi was Billג€™s landlord when we shot The Life Aquatic,ג€ explains Anderson, talking about his last movie, parts of which were filmed in Rome.

ג€œBut,ג€ I ask, ג€œwasnג€™t that back in 2004?ג€

ג€œYeah, Bill can be a little weird with time. But thereג€™s no hard feelings or anything. I think Luigi and Bill have a pretty good rapport, though Luigi will probably be happy to get his money.ג€

Anderson often finds himself in situations like this: real-life circumstances that have the same absurd, art-directed quality as his films. You may be tempted to shake your head and simply say that Anderson has been incredibly lucky, which is true, but that doesnג€™t give enough credit to his talentsג€”not just as a director, but more generally as someone who has constructed a life almost preposterously conducive to the pursuit of fantastical whims. When he was editing Darjeeling, for instance, he convinced Fox Searchlight to rent him a suite at the Inn at Irving Place, an unmarked hotel on Gramercy Park designed to re-create an era of faded glamour that probably never actually existed. Given that Anderson owns a spacious loft in the East Village that doubles as a work space, and that the studio could have rented any number of generic editing rooms for significantly less money, the logic behind this could be considered questionable. ג€œI remember walking in there and thinking, Man, only Wes would figure out a way to pull this off,ג€ recalls the photographer Gregory Crewdson, who befriended Anderson at a dinner party four years ago. ג€œThere was the little guy behind the desk, the narrow wooden staircase leading up to the roomג€”it was just perfect. In his films he creates a very particular and unmistakable world, and I guess you could say the same is true in his life.ג€

You need only watch a few frames of one of his movies to spot it as an Anderson production. Though he is originally from Texas, there is something distinctively European in his obsession with aesthetics: a belief that the way something looks is what dictates how it will make you feel. His impeccably composed wide-angle shots have the feeling of a childhood fantasy: wistful, more than a bit ridiculous, with a darkness creeping in at the edges. Pepper in some resurrected classic-rock songs; deadpan dialogue; themes of failure, nostalgia, and fractured families; and the result, at its best, is a world unto itself.

Though his films have collectively grossed only $100 millionג€”a large-sounding sum until you realize itג€™s exactly what they cost to makeג€”he is supported and adored by the studio system. ג€œFor studio executives, supporting Wes is like collecting art,ג€ says one friend. ג€œIt makes them feel they have great taste.ג€ The appeal is the films, of course, but also the persona of the eccentric auteur. He is an abnormally tall man, or at least a man so pale and so skinny that he appears to be abnormally tall. And he dresses primarily in suits custom-tailored to be a half-size too small, giving him the look of one of the off-kilter characters he puts on screen, further evidence that Andersonג€™s life is his work, and vice versa.

None of which is lost on Anderson himself. Last year, he made an excellent commercial for American Express in which he simultaneously parodied and breathed new life into the Anderson Myth. In the ad he is seen clothed in a vintage safari jacket, a viewfinder dangling from his neck, filming a (fictional) movie starring Schwartzman. Anderson walks through the set making sure every detail, no matter how absurd, is just so. ג€œCan you do a .357 with a bayonet?ג€ he asks a prop man, and two seconds laterג€”presto!ג€”a sketch of the nonsensical weapon is produced. Shot outside a French ch

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

something about these hipper-than-thou rich people really pisses me off
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

Does you piss you off as much as this, :lol: :
Anderson first got the itch to shoot in India after Martin Scorseseג€”an avowed fan who in Esquire once anointed Anderson ג€œthe next Scorseseג€ג€”

Trademark
oil baron swaggasaurus
Posts: 19683
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:37 pm

Post by Trademark »

completely agree with Drizzle, this ever growing cultural group annoys the FUCK out of me...

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

Icesickle wrote:Does you piss you off as much as this, :lol: :
Anderson first got the itch to shoot in India after Martin Scorseseג€”an avowed fan who in Esquire once anointed Anderson ג€œthe next Scorseseג€ג€”


no because i'm guessing this came around the bottle rocket/rushmore/tenenbaums days
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

User avatar
AWAE
Posts: 3484
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 8:44 pm

Post by AWAE »

since when has this guy had a 'mythology'..

sounds like bullshit..

PopeyeJones
Posts: 9507
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Beaumont-sur-Mer

Post by PopeyeJones »

Went and followed the reference to the Michael Hirschorn article in Atlantic Monthly. Dude is VP of Programming at VH1, and is pretty on point (he apparently writes for them about pop culture pretty regularly). Had some good points in his other pieces as well (and some shit) -- http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/by/michael_hirschorn

In any case, worth the read about the problems with kitsch/quirk

******************************************************

The unbearable lightness of Ira Glass, Wes Anderson, and other paragons of indie sensibility

by Michael Hirschorn

Quirked Around

Weג€™re drowning in quirk. It is the ruling sensibility of todayג€™s Gen-X indie culture, defined territorially by the gentle ministrations of public radioג€™s This American Life; the strenuously odd (and now canceled) TV sitcom Arrested Development; the movies of Wes Anderson; Dave Eggersג€™s McSweeneyג€™s Web site; the performance art, music, and writing of Miranda July; and the just-too-wacky-to-be-fully-believable memoirs of Augusten Burroughs.

Itג€™s been 20 years of beneficent, wide-eyed gazing upon the oddities of our fellow man. David Byrne probably birthed contemporary quirk around 1985ג€” halfway between his ג€œPsycho Killerג€ beginnings with the Talking Heads and his move to global popג€”when he sang the song ג€œStay Up Lateג€: ג€œCute, cute, little baby / Little pee-pee, little toes.ג€ (As it happens, Byrne appeared on Julyג€™s recent book tour.) Jon Cryerג€™s ג€œDuckieג€ Dale in Pretty in Pink came a year later, and quirk was on its way.

As an aesthetic principle, quirk is an embrace of the odd against the blandly mainstream. It features mannered ingenuousness, an embrace of small moments, narrative randomness, situationally amusing but not hilarious character juxtapositions (on HBOג€™s recent indie-cred comedy Flight of the Conchords, the titular folk-rock duo have one fan), and unexplainable but nonetheless charming character traits. Quirk takes not mattering very seriously.

Quirk is odd, but not too odd. That would take us all the way to weird, and there someone might get hurt. Napoleon Dynamite became a quirk classic by making heroes of Napoleon and Pedro, boy-men without qualities who team up against an alpha blonde to elect Mexican- immigrant Pedro class president at an Idaho high school. Napoleon seals the deal with a dance so transfixingly, transportingly wrong that it becomes a kind of deus ex machina. Pedro wins. (Indeed, inappropriate dancing is a big quirk trope, inasmuch as it provides a dramatic moment at which value systems can collide. See, for example, 7-year-old Oliveג€™s unwittingly hypersexualized routine to Rick Jamesג€™s ג€œSuper Freakג€ that brings the dysfunctional family together in last yearג€™s Little Miss Sunshine. This itself called out to the unwittingly only-slightly-less-hypersexualized preteen dance troupe Sparkle Motion in the 2001 quirk-noir Donnie Darko, a movie in which Jake Gyllenhaal takes orders from a giant rabbit.)

VIDEO: Watch Napoleon Dynamite's "transfixingly, transportingly wrong" dance routine

In Garden State, Zach Braffג€™s generation-defining 2004 movie about 20-something adult-onset agita, quirky Sam (Natalie Portman) shepherds sullen, affectless Andrew (Braff) off the well-trodden path of bourgeois conformity onto the slightly-less-trodden-upon fescue along the side of the road. After burying her pet hamster, they end up at a houseboat situated at the lip of a Newark quarry, where the inhabitants happen to be antique dealers. Random. The antique dealers have a piece of jewelry that belonged to Andrewג€™s dead mother. Andrew finds newfound purpose in lifeג€”purpose-lite, really.

The avatar of contemporary quirk is undoubtedly Ira Glass, the 40-something host of the long-running radio show This American Life, which recently completed its first season as a documentary series on Showtime. The TV show hews closely to the radio format (full disclosure: two of its executive producers are working with me on another project). Glass introduces each episode of the TV version from behind a deco desk placed somewhere nonsensical, like a parking garage or the Utah salt flats. Itג€™s a wryly funny visual gag: Throwback to older medium introduces TV show as if heג€™s come from the first days of TV.

Famously, the radio show tells multiple stories around a theme, with Glass, the pleasantly nasal narrator, gently prodding the action along and summing it up in ways that correct yet almost always redeem the peopleג€”white and middle-class, to a disconcerting degreeג€”who populate his stories. ג€œOurs really is a ministry of love,ג€ Glass told Entertainment Weekly earlier this year, in that non-ironic ironic way favored by the self-styledly quirky.

Itג€™s easy to fall in with TAL. The rhythms are lulling, and everyone involved appears to beג€”isג€”smart, idiosyncratic, charmingly self-effacing, well-meaning, much as most of us would like to be seen. Glass tells stories, and who does that anymore? The radio show has birthed and nurtured a slew of alt- culture stars (John Hodgman, Sarah Vowell, David Sedaris), and it thrives as the voice of a generation too young to buy into the broader public-radio mission (ג€œThis is the sound of Guatemalan basket weavers; their way of life is threatened ג€¦ג€) and too smart or old for the braying of commercial radio. Itג€™s the sound of Austin, Boulder, Berkeley, Red Hook, Madison, Cambridge, Adams Morganג€”of people who tend to think of themselves as engaged, aware.

TAL, as has been apparent for years, is really the opposite of documentary reportage. Itג€™s more like sociology, wherein the paradigm is set and specific circumstances are nipped, tucked, torqued, and squeezed until they fit the theme. Radio listeners canג€™t really fight through Glassג€™s scrim, so they have to take his word that the story is what he says it is. In the harsh light of television, however, the affectations of the radio show become glaringly clear. You can see how determined Glass is to bestow small breakthrough moments on his protagonists, whether theyג€™re aware of them or not. Weג€™re told, for instance, that the religious father of a lapsed-Mormon woman has come to a tentative understanding with his daughter after seeing her boyfriend play Jesus in a photo shoot. But mostly, she still just seems pissed off, and he remains a doctrinaire bore. Then thereג€™s the rancher who loves his one-of-a-kind, tourist-attracting bull (ג€œChanceג€) so much that he clones him (creating ג€œSecond Chanceג€). The man is said to have learned a gentle lesson about unintended consequences after the clone gores him in the testicles. But actually he doesnג€™t seem to have learned much of anything. He still believes Second Chance will be bankable, once the bull gets the testicle-goring out of his system. Mostly, the rancher seems either economically needy or a bit touched.

In a short introductory piece, an elderly guy who visits his wifeג€™s grave three times a week, but also brings along a TV set for company, is seen as just another piece of this magically odd tapestry we call America. There almost certainly are some depths hereג€”the loneliness of losing a spouse, the poignancy of aging, perhaps a touch of senile-onset dementiaג€”but weג€™re directed to see him as simply quirky, a guy doing his thing, man. ג€œWell,ג€ Glass says, ג€œitג€™s This American Life.ג€

TAL lives at a kind of permanent 70 degrees, moderate humidity. Everyone says his or her piece, is shown to have a flaw, then is revealed as a pretty all right person in the end. The TV show comes alive, as TV always does, when thereג€™s real anger and passion. The filmmaker and actor G. J. Echternkamp goes home to come to terms with his stepfather. The guy is Frank Garcia, most awesomely the bassist in a band called OXO, which had a hit back in the ג€™80s called ג€œWhirly Girl.ג€ Now heג€™s fat, hairy, drunk, and completely disengaged. Frank and G.J.ג€™s mom scream at each other in spasms of mutual distrust and miscomprehension, and she tries, within her limited emotional range, to explain why she was such a bad parent.

G.J. starts from a position of radical empathy for Mom, but makes a classic Glassian turn, realizing that Mom is feeding the dysfunction: Sheג€™s as crazy and narcissistic as Frank is. He, still fat and hairy, but maybe not so much of a drunk as G.J. thought, turns out to be a decent guy after all, if flawed in the way we all are: ג€œI want the best for you,ג€ Frank tells G.J. at the end of the segment. This narrative turn might have worked on radio, but on TV, these sloppy, damaged (and completely riveting) characters donג€™t settle nicely into the Jell-O mold that Glass-as-producer has poured them into. From the start, G.J.ג€™s mom is quite clearly unhinged, and only the most compliant viewer will accept the easy closure Glass imposes on the action.

To be fair, quirk, for all its steel-pike-like dominance of the great lake of indie culture, is not all bad. Wes Andersonג€™s wonderful 1998 film, Rushmore, about Max Fischer (Jason Schwartzman), a disaffected 15-year-old with a penchant for colorful lies and wildly over-the-top high-school theatrical productions, anchored its quirk in authentic human emotion (see particularly the deflated rich guy Herman Blume, played by the peerless Bill Murray). And Andersonג€™s seemingly random music choicesג€”the Whoג€™s ג€œA Quick One While Heג€™s Awayג€ plays just as Max sets a trap for Blume with a hive of bees; Yves Montandג€™s ג€œRue St. Vincentג€ bubbles in the background as Max awkwardly tries to seduce Miss Cross (Olivia Williams), the object of both guysג€™ affectionsג€”bespoke a deep understanding of how music can capture and elevate a specific feeling.

Correctly deployed, quirk yields unexpected treasures, perhaps even finds new ways to unlock that hoary emotion called sentiment, banished from the mainstream American novel (at least the fashionable, well-regarded novel) since sometime before John Barth. Jonathan Safran Foerג€™s 2002 novel, Everything Is Illuminated, uses quirkג€”itג€™s narrated in part by a Ukrainian with a uniquely malaprop take on Englishג€”to set us up for a powerful, and not at all quirky, modern-day confrontation with the Holocaustג€™s legacy. In Mark Haddonג€™s 2003 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, the narrator is an autistic boy, necessitating a quirkily reductive lens through which the action must be described. Once understanding dawns, the book is that much more affecting and profound. Likewise, Motherless Brooklyn, Jonathan Lethemג€™s stylized 1999 genre novel about a detective with Touretteג€™sג€”quirky modern hero situated in classic gangland milieuג€”works because of the authorג€™s masterful narrative control. (Not-totally- depressing afflictions that generate amusing dramatic configurations are a sign that quirk is afoot: Tony Shalhoubג€™s quirky Adrian Monk in the TV series Monk has OCD; Natalie Portmanג€™s Garden State character has epilepsy.)

Which leads to the problem with contemporary quirk: It can quickly go from an effective narrative tool to an end in itself. Anderson, flush from the brilliance of Rushmore, dove deep into self- indulgent eclecticism in 2001ג€™s The Royal Tenenbaums, which featured a family of dysfunctional geniuses with penchants for, among other things, youthful playwriting and breeding dalmatian mice. (Speaking of amusing afflictions: Bill Murrayג€™s Oliver Sacksג€“like neurologist in this film is researching a fictional disease called ג€œHeinsbergen Syndrome,ג€ which is marked by ג€œdyslexia, color blindness, amnesia, and highly acute hearing.ג€)

In Andersonג€™s most recent film, The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissouג€”a 2004 take on Jacques Cousteau filled with off-kilter gestures, gorgeous moments, and little narrative thrustג€”the debased-father/ingenuous-son dynamic played so believably and movingly in Rushmore by Murray and Schwartzman is reprised by Murray (playing the aging and mildly fraudulent Zissou as a more rough-hewn assemblage of the same traits he had in Rushmore) and Owen Wilson as a series of odd poses without real character development. Meanwhile, on the ship, the Brazilian musician and actor Seu Jorge sings the songs of David Bowie in Portuguese. Andersonג€™s newest, The Darjeeling Limited, about three brothers traveling through India, opens the New York Film Fest this month, and it promises, if nothing else, forward motion.

Quirk, loosed from its moorings, quickly becomes exhausting. Itג€™s easy for David Crossג€™s character on Arrested Development to cover himself in paint for a Blue Man Group audition, or for the New Zealand duo on Flight of the Conchords to make a spectacularly cheesy sci-fi video about the future while wearing low-rent robot costumes. But the pleasures are passing. Like the proliferation of meta-humor that followed David Letterman and Jerry Seinfeld in the ג€™90s, quirk is everywhere because quirkiness is so easy to achieve: Just be odd ג€¦ but endearing. It becomes a kind of psychographic marker, like wearing laceless Chuck Taylors or ironic facial hairג€”a self-satisfied pose that stands for nothing and doesnג€™t require you to take creative responsibility. Just because you can doesnג€™t mean you should.

Itג€™s harder to construct a coherent universe that has something to say about contemporary life. This is why Judd Apatowג€™s almost 100 percent quirk-free summer comedy, Knocked Up, packs such a punch. Its characters face real peril, show real anguish, and have genuine epiphanies. The comedy, at times so funny itג€™s painful, finds its potency in the absurdity of maleness, femaleness, singleness, married life. It dares to matter.

Quirk culture, by contrast, throws up its hands, gives a little chuckle, and says, ג€œWell, itג€™s This American Life.ג€

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

Popeye: I'm gonna make this its own seperate thread.

richard lamplighter
Posts: 1331
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:41 pm

Post by richard lamplighter »

i didn't mind the article. the euro-hopper intro was really smug seeming, but i read that as affectation by the writer, not hipper-than-thou anderson. i lived in france for 4 months or so, & if i presented my itenerary in a certain way it could seem like i was jumping around from place to place like this, where in reality i was on a modest budget just doing what everyone does. in europe, people visit different countries.

i know i've said it before but i don't understand the life aquatic hate. i view that as anderson's best film. including darjeeling, which was good, but not great on first viewing. but i have a feeling that just like all wes' other films, darjeeling will get better the more you watch them. i'm just continually flabbergasted by the fact that aquatic continually gets shitted on. the only flaw is the stupid looking shark at the end.

sneed
Posts: 7190
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 1:25 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Contact:

Post by sneed »

^^^whats up with your sig?

drizzle
Awesome Vatican Assassin
Posts: 55482
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems

Post by drizzle »

i like life aquatic a lot. murray, defoe, goldblum, blanchette - all great in that
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo

Trademark
oil baron swaggasaurus
Posts: 19683
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:37 pm

Post by Trademark »

I liked Life Aquatic enough to buy it twice......

Icesickle
Suburban Outfitter
Posts: 22728
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:00 pm

Post by Icesickle »

drizzle wrote:i like life aquatic a lot. murray, defoe, goldblum, blanchette - all great in that
Me too.

RacquetballGangsta
Posts: 10905
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 9:04 pm
Location: A satellite, bitch! I'm just that fly.
Contact:

Post by RacquetballGangsta »

drizzle wrote:something about these hipper-than-thou rich people really pisses me off
probably that you wish you had their lives?

i know i did. i mean, not the hipper than thou part..but i think the thing is that they know somewhat cool stuff to do with their money as opposed to some other rich people who do stupid shit like fly hot air balloons around the world or go to stupid places like st moritz and martha's vinyard.
twitter.com/deweydimbabwe
www.stonesthrow.com/vex

nett ist der kleine bruder von scheiße

Post Reply