I think the whole of the article is well-written and logical, but to essentially blame people who download for an artist taking their own life is absurd.On a personal level, I have witnessed the impoverishment of many critically acclaimed but marginally commercial artists. In particular, two dear friends: Mark Linkous (Sparklehorse) and Vic Chestnutt. Both of these artists, despite growing global popularity, saw their incomes collapse in the last decade. There is no other explanation except for the fact that גfansג made the unethical choice to take their music without compensating these artists.
Shortly before Christmas 2009, Vic took his life. He was my neighbor, and I was there as they put him in the ambulance. On March 6th, 2010, Mark Linkous shot himself in the heart. Anybody who knew either of these musicians will tell you that the pair suffered from addiction and depression. They will also tell you their situation was worsened by their financial situation. Vic was deeply in debt to hospitals and, at the time, was publicly complaining about losing his home. Mark was living in abject squalor in his remote studio in the Smokey Mountains without adequate access to the mental health care he so desperately needed.
I present these two stories to you not because Iגm pointing fingers or want to shame you. I just want to illustrate that גsmallג personal decisions have very real consequences, particularly when millions of people make the decision not to compensate artists they supposedly גloveג. And it is up to us individually to examine the consequences of our actions. It is not up to governments or corporations to make us choose to behave ethically. We have to do that ourselves.
Illegally Downloading = Involuntary Manslaughter?
Moderators: TheBigSleep, stype_ones, Philaflava
Illegally Downloading = Involuntary Manslaughter?
-
- phila HR Champ
- Posts: 21623
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
- Contact:
interesting approach and very believable with the right attorney. This story is so much better than breaking down the white black potential of underground rap personalities of the late 1990s.
for the record i was pretty sure justin warfield had more white than asian in him because only a white would rap about acid while holding a guitar case.
for the record i was pretty sure justin warfield had more white than asian in him because only a white would rap about acid while holding a guitar case.
-
- Posts: 12589
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:50 am
- Location: Nowhere For Very Long
Re: Illegally Downloading = Involuntary Manslaughter?
I agree with your sentiment, but I do think I've had some eye-opening moments in terms of seeing artists I thought should have been making a decent living in really messed up financial situations. I definitely don't think it's equivalent to murder/manslaughter by any stretch, as these artists could chose other walks of life to support themselves financially. At the same time, they shouldn't have to. Most people if they're as good at what they do as many rappers/musicians are at what they do, they make a decent living at it. To see musicians/rappers/producers working hard to stay impoverished is pretty fucked up. Especially when so many fans could afford to support and just don't.Employee wrote:I think the whole of the article is well-written and logical, but to essentially blame people who download for an artist taking their own life is absurd.On a personal level, I have witnessed the impoverishment of many critically acclaimed but marginally commercial artists. In particular, two dear friends: Mark Linkous (Sparklehorse) and Vic Chestnutt. Both of these artists, despite growing global popularity, saw their incomes collapse in the last decade. There is no other explanation except for the fact that גfansג made the unethical choice to take their music without compensating these artists.
Shortly before Christmas 2009, Vic took his life. He was my neighbor, and I was there as they put him in the ambulance. On March 6th, 2010, Mark Linkous shot himself in the heart. Anybody who knew either of these musicians will tell you that the pair suffered from addiction and depression. They will also tell you their situation was worsened by their financial situation. Vic was deeply in debt to hospitals and, at the time, was publicly complaining about losing his home. Mark was living in abject squalor in his remote studio in the Smokey Mountains without adequate access to the mental health care he so desperately needed.
I present these two stories to you not because Iגm pointing fingers or want to shame you. I just want to illustrate that גsmallג personal decisions have very real consequences, particularly when millions of people make the decision not to compensate artists they supposedly גloveג. And it is up to us individually to examine the consequences of our actions. It is not up to governments or corporations to make us choose to behave ethically. We have to do that ourselves.
https://soundcloud.com/jay-beware/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Y.O.T.M.B.
- Posts: 39450
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
yeah, a bit much.
"suffered from addiction and depression" is
them shits kill more people than a ISP ever will.
yeah it sucks that nobody buys music anymore... but artists can't blame technology for that. they have to use it to their advantage.
Hollywood went 3-D when the internet started raping them.
musicians need to become extra special again so people want to see the show.and you can't do a show if you're dead.
wait * hologram Tupac*
"suffered from addiction and depression" is
them shits kill more people than a ISP ever will.
yeah it sucks that nobody buys music anymore... but artists can't blame technology for that. they have to use it to their advantage.
Hollywood went 3-D when the internet started raping them.
musicians need to become extra special again so people want to see the show.and you can't do a show if you're dead.
wait * hologram Tupac*
You're in Heaven right now, God.
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
-
- phila HR Champ
- Posts: 21623
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Illegally Downloading = Involuntary Manslaughter?
Getting a normal job obviously not an option then.Anybody who knew either of these musicians will tell you that the pair suffered from addiction and depression. They will also tell you their situation was worsened by their financial situation. Vic was deeply in debt to hospitals and, at the time, was publicly complaining about losing his home
ONLY BUILT FOR zSHARE LINKS
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
http://www.djstepone.blogspot.com
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
in many cases...sure, but that's talking about stuff that sold well pre-download era like Candlebox. not everything that's downloaded is on the same plane as Candlebox. Who all bought the El-P album and who downloaded it?capable_keL wrote:artists should accept responsibility for making music that nobody objects to stealing because that's pretty much the same thing they did under a thin veil of perceived talent.
if we're gonna keep it 100
Insisting that artists need to become "extra special" again to attract people to shows, like Mindbender stated, is a bit asinine.
When people think of Providence, Rhode Island they typically think of organized crime
-
- phila HR Champ
- Posts: 21623
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:58 pm
- Contact:
-
- Y.O.T.M.B.
- Posts: 39450
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
sure, they CAN. but how futile is that resistance?Dunnnnleavy wrote:actually, they can.Mindbender Futurama wrote:
yeah it sucks that nobody buys music anymore... but artists can't blame technology for that.
are you going to blame basic human evolution for happening too?
if you blame technology like it's your enemy... what the your solution?
destroy technology? remove the internet from planet earth?
i know what you are saying, but grandma and grandpa ain't "winning" by remaining luddites, mang.
if you can't beat 'em, join' em.
You're in Heaven right now, God.
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Y.O.T.M.B.
- Posts: 39450
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
I don't mean "again"... I mean, artists ALWAYS should be fucking unique enough that you can't duplicate the joy the performer gives with a single MP3 download or a YouTube video clip. People think music is disposable shit in folders you accumulate and then trash, instead of a real world artform where money and time and energy is well worth investing. You know, like a fucking Grateful Dead or Phish fan feels.Dunnnnleavy wrote: Insisting that artists need to become "extra special" again to attract people to shows, like Mindbender stated, is a bit asinine.
I've seen Rick Ross perform. Front row. FOR FREE. But there is NO WAY IN THE FUCKING WORLD I am going to another Rick Ross concert. Because it is NOT special in any way shape or form. Poor performer, sub-par crowd interaction, and the polished and cinematic album experience is nowhere near recreated live.
On the other hand, I've seen the Roots 19 times, and De La Soul about 11 times... ~over the course of twenty years.~ Every single fucking time, they are fresh, unique, special, original, creative... and so forth. I have their t-shirts, videos, CDs, cassettes, I have a few Questlove drumsticks concert souvenirs, for fuck sakes.
when everyone is style biting and trend hopping and acting all follow fashion, they all suck ass and almost nobody will care for very long about your shit. because it IS shit.
I may be of the minority opinion, but I like people like Sade and Fiona Apple. They're like "I'll kinda sorta meet you all half way, maybe... but I WON'T sacrifice my fucking artistic dignity to appease the masses and the modern ways of the world, especially if it's not parallel to my nature."
Sade don't need to get on Twitter all day and Ustream her band practices (but I'd watch if she did )
and when Sade came to Toronto, she filled up the ACC. that's at least 20,000 people coming to have a possibly once-in-a-lifetime experience.
now i know most artists aren't on Sade/Bjork/Fiona/D'Angelo level... but I think they should STRIVE to be. and i know nobody but a few artists could survive only touring every 10 years like Sade, but still... the point is: BE SPECIAL, and maybe people WILL value your music enough to give you enough money to keep you out of depression and addiction and poverty.
for a hip hop equivalent? the first person that came to mind was Cormega.
and last time Cormega was in Toronto, he sold out a 1000 person venue and had the walls shaking from cats screaming his lyrics.
You're in Heaven right now, God.
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:35 pm
Sounds like someone didn't read the ?uestlove article on the top-17 Candlebox deep cuts.Dunnnnleavy wrote:in many cases...sure, but that's talking about stuff that sold well pre-download era like Candlebox. not everything that's downloaded is on the same plane as Candlebox. Who all bought the El-P album and who downloaded it?capable_keL wrote:artists should accept responsibility for making music that nobody objects to stealing because that's pretty much the same thing they did under a thin veil of perceived talent.
if we're gonna keep it 100
Check out my FREE album featuring MAC LETHAL, ALASKA from HANGAR 18, HOMEBOY SANDMAN and J57 of the BROWN BAG ALL STARS -
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
http://chazkangas.bandcamp.com
http://www.twitter.com/chazraps
http://www.popularopinions.wordpress.com
- GUCCI CONDOMS
- Posts: 20799
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:09 am
- Location: NYC
-
- Jennie C is a Fucking Asshole
- Posts: 13137
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 2:53 pm
- Location: the crib in Jackson Heights
- Contact:
The article makes a salient point because, prior to the twenty-first century, artists working in all media were the most respected, highest-paid people in the world. The music industry was a great system which helped keep all working musicians paid and comfortable. And now the listeners have circumvented that system to take advantage! It is as if each of us held the trigger on the gun that killed whats-his-name and some-other-guy.
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
totes, uber-white, brah...this is what white people gave cash to in the 90s...capable_keL wrote:not familiar with this candlebox in which you speak but given your background, my dear friend, i assume its white people music
i agree dunny, and i'll see you in a few months
<object width="420" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7mICybM1sRY?ve ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7mICybM1sRY?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
maybe if i substituted Candlebox with Bell Biv Devoe? as long as you see my point.
Mindbender...you're a space alien.
I don't have a problem with downloading as long as you don't back it up with any excuses and just admit it's in your self-interest to save money and find the easy link. bam, case closed.the article Employee posted discussed this excuse for downloading wrote:Artists can make money on the road (or its variant גArtists are richג). The average income of a musician that files taxes is something like 35k a year w/o benefits. The vast majority of artists do not make significant money on the road. Until recently, most touring activity was a money losing operation. The idea was the artists would make up the loss through recorded music sales. This has been reversed by the financial logic of file-sharing and streaming. You now tour to support making albums if you are very, very lucky. Otherwise, you pay for making albums out of your own pocket. Only the very top tier of musicians make ANY money on the road. And only the 1% of the 1% makes significant money on the road. (For now.)
When people think of Providence, Rhode Island they typically think of organized crime
-
- Y.O.T.M.B.
- Posts: 39450
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
thanks brah
i been trying to tell folks that long time now
and music is fucked. both the industry and the artform itself.
but it's still probably never been a better time to be a musician :kanyeshrug:
music is out of control
i been trying to tell folks that long time now
and music is fucked. both the industry and the artform itself.
but it's still probably never been a better time to be a musician :kanyeshrug:
music is out of control
You're in Heaven right now, God.
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Create the universe you dream of.
http://www.mindbenderlovesyou.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Some of us who have families, rent and food to put on the table can't afford to spend as much on entertainment as we would like to. Should we stay oblivious to your music or download it and at least pass the word around. I don't go around burning discs of shit I've downloaded though.
If it's dope and I can buy it, I will.
If it's dope and I can buy it, I will.
Philaflava wrote:all these new blog rappers should be tasered on the regular.
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
Exactly. It's in your self-interest to not buy everything you listen to you. The article's main point is to convince people while downloading does subtract money from artists it is a moral and ethical issue, and that the government need not get involved.chiefbombpro wrote:Some of us who have families, rent and food to put on the table can't afford to spend as much on entertainment as we would like to. Should we stay oblivious to your music or download it and at least pass the word around. I don't go around burning discs of shit I've downloaded though.
If it's dope and I can buy it, I will.
When people think of Providence, Rhode Island they typically think of organized crime
-
- Posts: 3720
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:38 am
- Location: Bible Belt Misery
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 4275
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 8:41 pm
i've purchased more than my share of music over the years. as stated before in this thread, with a growing family, a house and bills i just dont have the disposable income to spend on music. i also don't really download much either, but i will try to get something off the net if i'm interested in it. if it's good, i'll buy the album when i have the means.
these days, eight out of ten times the entire album isn't worth the purchase, in which case the artist would have been ripping me off had i purchased it.
i think more artists need to use the 'pay what you can' route for downloading music. cut out all the middle men that drive the cost of retail music purchases up and put their music out there themselves. i think you would find people would be more than willing to kick in 2-3-5$ or more if the product was worth it. is that not better than getting nothing, or whatever percentage of retail sales they get?
these days, eight out of ten times the entire album isn't worth the purchase, in which case the artist would have been ripping me off had i purchased it.
i think more artists need to use the 'pay what you can' route for downloading music. cut out all the middle men that drive the cost of retail music purchases up and put their music out there themselves. i think you would find people would be more than willing to kick in 2-3-5$ or more if the product was worth it. is that not better than getting nothing, or whatever percentage of retail sales they get?
- GUCCI CONDOMS
- Posts: 20799
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:09 am
- Location: NYC
- Shiftshock
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:29 pm
-
- Posts: 897
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:21 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 12589
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:50 am
- Location: Nowhere For Very Long
Reggie wrote:The article makes a salient point because, prior to the twenty-first century, artists working in all media were the most respected, highest-paid people in the world. The music industry was a great system which helped keep all working musicians paid and comfortable. And now the listeners have circumvented that system to take advantage! It is as if each of us held the trigger on the gun that killed whats-his-name and some-other-guy.
https://soundcloud.com/jay-beware/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;