Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
Moderator: drizzle
Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
"A touch of the Dunkirk spirit, know what I mean?"
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
Wasn't feeling this. Teaser had me excited but this looks like he just wants to check a war movie off his list.
Edit: autocorrect
Edit: autocorrect
Last edited by alpha on Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Awesome Vatican Assassin
- Posts: 55482
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
- Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
I might be kinda over Nolan, had little interest in Interstellar and this one doesn't really move me either
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo
- EMCEE DARTH MALEK
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:51 am
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
you'd think "saving private ryan" meets "titanic" would be a good idea but
1. Nas
2. Drake
that's pretty much it fam.
2. Drake
that's pretty much it fam.
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
the teaser they had released earlier looks promising but I'm not sure now. I'll wait for HBO
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
not a big war movie fan but Nolan tackling the subject with imax footage makes it worthy of checking out in the theater
-
- Posts: 5587
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:19 am
- Location: Santa Barbara, Ca
- Contact:
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
Saw this on thursday. Wasn't really even a war movie as much as a survival type movie. But I dug it. Was short as fuck....but I liked it.
http://www.soundcloud.com/rafael-jesus-martinez" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
fucking good shit. Zimmer + Nolan = fucking dope
-
- Posts: 5587
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:19 am
- Location: Santa Barbara, Ca
- Contact:
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
I honestly hated what Zimmer did. That ticking clock shit was throwing off my attention. No joke I asked my chick wtf was that noise before realizing it was in the movie.
http://www.soundcloud.com/rafael-jesus-martinez" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
Liked it other than the Spitfire scenes, which seemed to drag on forever
-
- Posts: 5587
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:19 am
- Location: Santa Barbara, Ca
- Contact:
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
admiral wrote:Liked it other than the Spitfire scenes, which seemed to drag on forever
http://www.soundcloud.com/rafael-jesus-martinez" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
nolan and his camera people; very underrated photographers though.
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
saw it this weekend
a lot of memorable scenes in this movie
tom hardy was great
i feel like im the only one that didnt care about harry styles afting, despite ALL the fucking abnoxious articles hyping him up. he was mediocre.
also i felt like the cillian murphey storyline, and some other portions of the film, didnt have have that "lets go backward in time" thing that Christopher Nolan likes to do in his movies. it just wasnt necessary.
regardless, the movie was great, would recommend it and re-watch it for sure.
a lot of memorable scenes in this movie
tom hardy was great
i feel like im the only one that didnt care about harry styles afting, despite ALL the fucking abnoxious articles hyping him up. he was mediocre.
also i felt like the cillian murphey storyline, and some other portions of the film, didnt have have that "lets go backward in time" thing that Christopher Nolan likes to do in his movies. it just wasnt necessary.
regardless, the movie was great, would recommend it and re-watch it for sure.
-
- Awesome Vatican Assassin
- Posts: 55482
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 2:55 pm
- Location: where people throw ducks at balloons and nothing is as it seems
Re: Dunkirk (Christopher Nolan) Trailer
surprisingly loved the shit out of it, easily Nolan's best movie imo
There are a few thing off in retrospect, already mentioned here - Tom Hardy's ending is a head scratchier that pulls things toward a kind of romantic realism that doesn't happen anywhere else in the movie, the George/Cilian Murphy thing doesn't quite gel (although I see what they were going for) and it feels like they could've done a bit more than this with the civilian boats section. And the whole movie in general has a faint feel of pro-British propaganda, although that doesn't detract from its effectiveness as a thriller/survival movie nor from the masterclass of direction that Nolan puts on. As a theater experience it's tremendous, I think I'm going to see it again in 70mm Imax.
There are a few thing off in retrospect, already mentioned here - Tom Hardy's ending is a head scratchier that pulls things toward a kind of romantic realism that doesn't happen anywhere else in the movie, the George/Cilian Murphy thing doesn't quite gel (although I see what they were going for) and it feels like they could've done a bit more than this with the civilian boats section. And the whole movie in general has a faint feel of pro-British propaganda, although that doesn't detract from its effectiveness as a thriller/survival movie nor from the masterclass of direction that Nolan puts on. As a theater experience it's tremendous, I think I'm going to see it again in 70mm Imax.
http://www.steadybloggin.com - some of these are my thoughts yo