Anyone see Mr. Brooks?

beans79 · Post by **beans79** » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:58 am

Did anyone see Mr. Brooks, and if so, what did you think?

blessingindisguise · Post by **blessingindisguise** » Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:25 am

I thought it was a good horror/thriller flick. Kevin Costner(surprisingly) did a good job as a coldhearted, sadistic, killer. I would definitly reccomend it.

Patches O'Houlihan · Post by **Patches O'Houlihan** » Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:48 pm

Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor

beans79 · Post by **beans79** » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:07 pm

Patches O'Houlihan wrote:Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor

On general principle I absolutely agree with you.

But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook. I wanted to see how he handled a non-comedy role, and I thought he did a really good job! His character was this whiny little bitch...simplistic way of putting it, but meh, I think it covers it.

Smooth Lou · Post by **Smooth Lou** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:04 am

beans79 wrote:
Patches O'Houlihan wrote:Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
On general principle I absolutely agree with you.

Me too. But A Perfect World with Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood is still an amazing film.

Sankofa · Post by **Sankofa** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:53 am

Smooth Lou wrote:
beans79 wrote:
Patches O'Houlihan wrote:Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
On general principle I absolutely agree with you.
Me too. But A Perfect World with Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood is still an amazing film with a cornball ending.

YouTube · Post by **Philaflava** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:25 am

Costner should ONLY be allowed to make baseball movies.

Sankofa · Post by **Sankofa** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:47 pm

^No way. Field of Dreams was garbage.

intuition · Post by **intuition** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:06 pm

beans79 wrote:But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.

blessingindisguise · Post by **blessingindisguise** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:56 pm

^No way. Field of Dreams was garbage.

I hope that was sarcasm.

Sankofa · Post by **Sankofa** » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:47 pm

blessingindisguise wrote:
^No way. Field of Dreams was garbage.
I hope that was sarcasm.

Hell no, that flick was cornball trash.

beans79 · Post by **beans79** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:51 pm

intuition wrote:
beans79 wrote:But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.

Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not

SYM · Post by **SYM** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:02 pm

a world where dane cook can nab legitimate movie roles.

time to find me a good agent.

richard lamplighter · Post by **richard lamplighter** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:51 pm

i saw this

was expecting it to be average

was better than i expected

worth seeing if this type of movie is your thing

Dids · Post by **Dids** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:15 pm

beans79 wrote:
intuition wrote:
beans79 wrote:But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.

Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not

But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.

None · Post by **None** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:39 pm

Dids wrote:
beans79 wrote:
intuition wrote:
beans79 wrote:But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.

Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.

beans79 · Post by **beans79** » Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:57 pm

Dids wrote:
beans79 wrote:
intuition wrote:
beans79 wrote:But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.

Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.

I'm signing my own death warrant here, but honestly, I find him rather amusing.