Page 2 of 2

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:32 pm
by Ramen
man, this shit is confusing as hell.

wasn't the girl tied up in the woods that they came across the girl from the introduction briefing?

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:03 pm
by alpha
Yes, which only gives that theory more legs.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:22 pm
by Ramen
which theory, the dual timeline? Ford been reassigning hosts all over the park for his new story too tho. She could have been one of them.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 5:47 pm
by samdoom
Ramen wrote:which theory, the dual timeline? Ford been reassigning hosts all over the park for his new story too tho. She could have been one of them.
I believe the MIB acknowledges recognizing her when they come across her which lends credence to McPoyle being the MIB

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:42 pm
by Ramen
yeah he does, but he has also been going there for years too.


seen a pic that showed her in the park before too, I'll try to find it again.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:36 pm
by Ramen
Image

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:03 am
by 907
DAMN, that was a great episode.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:15 pm
by EMCEE DARTH MALEK
i think the main cast are robots or some shit too

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:45 pm
by drizzle
love this dumbass show no matter how huge the plot holes are and how frustratingly clumsly and unclever it is in exploring the really good ideas it created for itself

it's hilarious that Nolan was like 'LET'S TURN THIS DUMBASS PREMISE OF ROBOTS GOING HOMICIDAL INTO A BLADERUNNER WITH COWBOYS', then mostly avoided engaging with his own concept by stacking up convoluted plot twists and gotchas instead

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 6:48 pm
by Ramen
not sure whats going on still, hopefully the payoff is good

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 7:03 pm
by drizzle
nobody is sure what's going on, most likely including the writers

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 7:40 pm
by EMCEE DARTH MALEK
only two ways the ending will be satisfying

-anthony hopkins is secretly a robot

-absolutely everyone else is secretly a robot

Re: Westworld

Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:54 am
by Ramen
was I the only one who was like uh ok what does that mean when Bernard was revealed as a Arnold clone? I seen that people's mind exploded.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:00 pm
by Kace
drizzle wrote:love this dumbass show no matter how huge the plot holes are and how frustratingly clumsly and unclever it is in exploring the really good ideas it created for itself

it's hilarious that Nolan was like 'LET'S TURN THIS DUMBASS PREMISE OF ROBOTS GOING HOMICIDAL INTO A BLADERUNNER WITH COWBOYS', then mostly avoided engaging with his own concept by stacking up convoluted plot twists and gotchas instead
How is the series compared to the movie, is it very different from the show?

Re: Westworld

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:33 pm
by drizzle
The movie has nothing do with any of this, it's literally just 20 mins of set up and then about 70 mins of robots killing people. There is no existentialism, no conspiracy, nothing except scifi pulp. The only significant theme outside of robot murder is making fun of the hedonism on which the park is predicated and showing guests and park managers as mostly unlikeable and/or incompetent (presumably to make them less sympathetic when the killing starts.)

The sequel supposedly comes a little closer to what the show is about but is also supposed to be worse than the original.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:04 pm
by drizzle
The best explainer for the 3 timelines I've seen yet. I'm fine with all of this but I hate that the MIB/William thing is just taken for granted as true. It just a dumb editing trick that makes 0 sense in terms of the way these characters were presented to us. The mental gymnastics needed to plausibly patch William becoming the MIB and doing whatever he's doing 30 years later, while also accounting for the pieces of the MIB backstory we've been given, are insane at best.

http://uproxx.com/tv/westworld-timelines-unraveled/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Westworld

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:00 pm
by alpha
Not bad. I feel the show just tries to be confusing just to be confusing. Just the part about teddy in the link assumes so much.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:35 am
by CheezPizza
holy shit

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:42 am
by drizzle
Lol literally every single thing happened as various theories have been predicting since mid season, down to the uprising being Ford's narrative and what happens to him. For a show that clearly wants to surprise its audience that's a huge fail.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:22 pm
by Guun
Thought the finale was great. Still really enjoyed the show despite the plot holes and predictable mysteries. Excited to see where they take it next season now that most of the mysteries have been unveiled.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:39 pm
by drizzle
It is very watchable, no doubt there. Good production values and acting and a perpetual air of mystery and promise of something really interesting just around the next corner goes a long way to balancing the forehead slapping idiocy.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:03 am
by Ramen
Would y'all rather go to Westworld or Samurai World tho

Re: Westworld

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:26 pm
by 360
Samurai world for sure.

Re: Westworld

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2016 3:27 pm
by intuition
pretty astounding how the uproxx writer nailed it like that.

people are way better at watching tv shows than i am.

(i stuck with the show cuz my girl liked it).

Re: Westworld

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:30 pm
by EMCEE DARTH MALEK
360 wrote:Samurai world for sure.
i was hoping they'd get the samurai in on the uprising.



so what ya'll think is s2 gonna be "battlestar galactica" ?