Discuss the world of entertainment; movies, tv, journalism and radio.
Moderator: drizzle
beans79
Posts: 2215 Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: on the move
Post
by beans79 » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:58 am
Did anyone see Mr. Brooks, and if so, what did you think?
(18:05:41) NerdyBroad: libido cancels logic everytime
blessingindisguise
Posts: 9469 Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:53 pm
Post
by blessingindisguise » Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:25 am
I thought it was a good horror/thriller flick. Kevin Costner(surprisingly) did a good job as a coldhearted, sadistic, killer. I would definitly reccomend it.
Patches O'Houlihan
Posts: 1327 Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Miami
Post
by Patches O'Houlihan » Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:48 pm
Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
A new era has begun and it goes by the numbers 1,3,6
beans79
Posts: 2215 Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: on the move
Post
by beans79 » Sat Jun 02, 2007 9:07 pm
Patches O'Houlihan wrote: Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
On general principle I absolutely agree with you.
But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook. I wanted to see how he handled a non-comedy role, and I thought he did a really good job! His character was this whiny little bitch...simplistic way of putting it, but meh, I think it covers it.
(18:05:41) NerdyBroad: libido cancels logic everytime
Smooth Lou
The Mayor
Posts: 8623 Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:
Post
by Smooth Lou » Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:04 am
beans79 wrote: Patches O'Houlihan wrote: Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
On general principle I absolutely agree with you.
Me too. But A Perfect World with Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood is still an amazing film.
Sankofa
Posts: 9442 Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: Fort Wayne
Post
by Sankofa » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:53 am
Smooth Lou wrote: beans79 wrote: Patches O'Houlihan wrote: Kevin Costner is an incredibly bad actor
On general principle I absolutely agree with you.
Me too. But A Perfect World with Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood is still an amazing film with a cornball ending.
Philaflava
King of The DPB'rs
Posts: 81374 Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
Contact:
Post
by Philaflava » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:25 am
Costner should ONLY be allowed to make baseball movies.
Sankofa
Posts: 9442 Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: Fort Wayne
Post
by Sankofa » Sun Jun 03, 2007 12:47 pm
^No way. Field of Dreams was garbage.
intuition
Uh, I rap too!
Posts: 11566 Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 7:30 am
Post
by intuition » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:06 pm
beans79 wrote: But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.
Sankofa
Posts: 9442 Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: Fort Wayne
Post
by Sankofa » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:47 pm
blessingindisguise wrote: ^No way. Field of Dreams was garbage.
I hope that was sarcasm.
Hell no, that flick was cornball trash.
beans79
Posts: 2215 Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: on the move
Post
by beans79 » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:51 pm
intuition wrote: beans79 wrote: But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.
Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
(18:05:41) NerdyBroad: libido cancels logic everytime
SYM
The Overlord of Overthinking
Posts: 20088 Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: BK
Post
by SYM » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:02 pm
a world where dane cook can nab legitimate movie roles.
time to find me a good agent.
richard lamplighter
Posts: 1331 Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:41 pm
Post
by richard lamplighter » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:51 pm
i saw this
was expecting it to be average
was better than i expected
worth seeing if this type of movie is your thing
Dids
Posts: 10525 Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: iamdids.tumblr.com
Contact:
Post
by Dids » Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:15 pm
beans79 wrote: intuition wrote: beans79 wrote: But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.
Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.
None
Posts: 4849 Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 3:17 pm
Contact:
Post
by None » Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:39 pm
Dids wrote: beans79 wrote: intuition wrote: beans79 wrote: But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.
Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.
beans79
Posts: 2215 Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: on the move
Post
by beans79 » Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:57 pm
Dids wrote: beans79 wrote: intuition wrote: beans79 wrote: But I ended up checking out this movie today b/c of Dane Cook.
Uh, I'm a chick...so, you know, I can go see Dane Cook and its not
But this implies you find Dane Cook funny/watchable, which is inexcusable regardless of gender.
I'm signing my own death warrant here, but honestly, I find him rather amusing.
(18:05:41) NerdyBroad: libido cancels logic everytime